Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,841 posts)
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 09:55 PM Jan 2020

What stops McConnell from passing a rule that allows ONE witness-- Hunter Biden ?

He's got the votes to ram through anything he wants. Why go through the motions (with Cruz) for trading witnesses with the Democrats? It's not like he's making any effort to make the rest of the trial seem on the square.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What stops McConnell from passing a rule that allows ONE witness-- Hunter Biden ? (Original Post) Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 OP
They don't want any witnesses , only an excuse for not having them. dem4decades Jan 2020 #1
There's already a gate-keeper motion in the rules DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #2
Nothing, if they have the votes. Raven123 Jan 2020 #3
+1, I've dug into the MSNBC poll a little and the LV numbers are HORRIBLE for Red Don uponit7771 Jan 2020 #7
Because it's all a ruse... choie Jan 2020 #4
Based on the rule passed last night, that is not likely. tritsofme Jan 2020 #5
That explains it. It opens a pandora's box maybe Mitch can't easily close. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #8
K&R, McKaskil says Moscow Mitch and the kGOP is bluffing about the Bidens and doesn't uponit7771 Jan 2020 #6

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
2. There's already a gate-keeper motion in the rules
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:00 PM
Jan 2020

where the Senate must first vote to allow motions to call witnesses and documents.

If they want to call Hunter Biden, they have to approve that motion first. If they do, then the door is open for anyone to ask for witnesses. Of course, it's entirely possible Rs could vote not to hear every witness but Biden, but they have to allow for witnesses and documents first.

Raven123

(4,849 posts)
3. Nothing, if they have the votes.
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:00 PM
Jan 2020

However, if the current polls are close to accurate, such a decision might sink the GOP in the election. Also, I suspect McConnell wants to avoid potential surprises. He would rather have zero witnesses and documents.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
7. +1, I've dug into the MSNBC poll a little and the LV numbers are HORRIBLE for Red Don
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:16 PM
Jan 2020

... I don't see anything changing peoples minds from 57% removal to giving Red Don another term.

choie

(4,111 posts)
4. Because it's all a ruse...
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:03 PM
Jan 2020

McConnell doesn't really want Biden to testify. He knows damn well he has nothing to offer, and is just using him.

tritsofme

(17,380 posts)
5. Based on the rule passed last night, that is not likely.
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:10 PM
Jan 2020

There will be a motion before the Senate at the conclusion of opening statements and questions to decide whether they will hear witnesses, if it is adopted there will be votes on specific witnesses and documents. If it fails, the trial is basically over and they will move for acquittal.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,841 posts)
8. That explains it. It opens a pandora's box maybe Mitch can't easily close.
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:21 PM
Jan 2020

But you'd think Schumer would call to consider it at the appropriate time instead of shutting down the idea of calling Biden at all.

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
6. K&R, McKaskil says Moscow Mitch and the kGOP is bluffing about the Bidens and doesn't
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 10:14 PM
Jan 2020

... want them at all another MSNBC analyst said a Biden subpoena would take minimum a week and elongate the trial.

I'm thinking, call their bluff ... knock them on their asses

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What stops McConnell from...