Why is Ghouliani not indicted?

[brush]

[OnDoutside]

1. Barr.

[uponit7771]

4. What about independent persecutors?! Seems like that's hack to not do what the law says

[OnDoutside]

7. From what we've seen in other cases, there seems to be a difference

If it's federal or state, and the Barr DOJ can insert their influence in a federal investigation, in terms of whether to prosecute.

I'm sure our resident legal eagles vwill know more.

[getagrip_already]

10. Those don't exist

All decisions to prosecute or defer reside with the doj, and ultimately barr.

There are a lot of people besides potus who seem to have slipped by despite massive evidence they should be arrested. The kids, anyone involved in where the inauguration money went, anyone involved in the messes at the treasury or epa, etc.

But I guess he doesn't always have his eyes on the ball or people like parnas wouldn't have been charged. If trump knew they were going to do that, he would have stopped it.

The doj and fbi are largely compromised and corrupted.

[Leghorn21]

2. My humble opinion is that he's such an idiot and such low-hanging fruit that, hey, let him run amuck

and lead the G-men to other conspirators, because - why not?! He’s saving them a lot of trouble!

[Yonnie3]

6. Yes!

He's more of an asset running his mouth than lawyered up..

I also wonder if there have been some warrants for electronic surveillance.

[AJT]

3. I think we're getting way ahead of ourselves.

[brush]

8. How so? Parnas and his other partner-in-crime were indicted weeks ago.

[The Velveteen Ocelot]

5. Has he even been investigated? Don't put the cart before the horse.

It's not likely that he will be indicted as long as Barr is AG.

[brush]

9. See post #8.

[marble falls]

11. Its only a matter of time and he WILL plea bargain.