Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,094 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:25 PM Jan 2020

Wealth Tax Has Broad Public Support

https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/11/wealth-tax-has-broad-public-support/

Wealth Tax Has Broad Public Support
January 11, 2020 at 7:53 am EST By Taegan Goddard


A new Reuters/Ipsos poll finds 64% of Americans strongly or somewhat agreed that “the very rich should contribute an extra share of their total wealth each year to support public programs” – the essence of a wealth tax.

Results were similar across gender, race and household income. While support among Democrats was stronger, at 77%, a majority of Republicans, 53%, also agreed with the idea.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wealth Tax Has Broad Public Support (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2020 OP
let's set the top bracket over one billion dollars at 100% scarytomcat Jan 2020 #1
Common sense, the problem is getting a well LIKED person in the WH to sell it. Eliot Rosewater Jan 2020 #2
+1000 UniteFightBack Jan 2020 #6
And this also argues that lowering the tax rates for the bottom 25% and raising them for the top 10% guillaumeb Jan 2020 #3
I support it drmeow Jan 2020 #4
K&R for visibility crickets Jan 2020 #5
I'm very much in favor of it, but is it Constitutional? Mariana Jan 2020 #7

scarytomcat

(1,706 posts)
1. let's set the top bracket over one billion dollars at 100%
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:30 PM
Jan 2020

Why do we need billionaires? Let others have a chance.

Eliot Rosewater

(31,121 posts)
2. Common sense, the problem is getting a well LIKED person in the WH to sell it.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:31 PM
Jan 2020

Someone KNOWN to get along with others, not a loner.

Someone with a TRACK record in this exact area...

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
3. And this also argues that lowering the tax rates for the bottom 25% and raising them for the top 10%
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 02:21 PM
Jan 2020

would have broad appeal as well.

The top 10%, and especially the top 1%, are so wealthy that they could easily pay much more than they do. And that increased tax rate should apply to unearned as well as earned income.

drmeow

(5,025 posts)
4. I support it
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 11:55 AM
Jan 2020

Only because it's easier to describe and for people to understand and more likely to pass than eliminating the special capital gains tax rate (which I've benefitted from but is criminal), taxing ALL income using a progressive tax structure, eliminating the Social Security and Medicare cap and instead not starting those deductions until an earner is a certain amount above the poverty level (while still counting those earnings), and getting corporations to once again pay a larger part of the tax revenue which is what I REALLY support.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wealth Tax Has Broad Publ...