Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,060 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:44 PM Jan 2020

How Republican hawks primed Trump to strike back at Iran

On the night of June 19, President Donald Trump approved and then abruptly called off military strikes against Iran in retaliation for a downed US surveillance drone.

The move, which came after months of escalating tensions, confused and frustrated many of the President's more hawkish advisers and allies, who had hoped he would take a stronger stand against Iran and were concerned that his pull back would send a signal of weakness and only embolden the government in Tehran.

In the six months since, many of those hawks have largely felt justified in their concern as Iran has continued to attack and threaten the United States and its allies in the region, according to two Republicans who acknowledged they were troubled by what they had come to believe were empty words from Trump. Through private conversations and carefully calibrated public statements, they have tried to push the President to match his often tough rhetoric toward Iran with equally tough action.

The next time an opportunity arose to strike back at Iran, the hawks hoped, Trump would be primed to act.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-republican-hawks-primed-trump-to-strike-back-at-iran/ar-BBYDqdA?li=BBnbcA1

Do these people get a hard on over war? How are they any better than serial killers?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Republican hawks prim...