Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,075 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 01:57 PM Jan 2020

Pentagon Officials Reportedly "Stunned" by Trump's Decision to Kill Soleimani

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/pentagon-officials-reportedly-stunned-trump-kill-soleimani.html

Pentagon Officials Reportedly “Stunned” by Trump’s Decision to Kill Soleimani
By Daniel Politi
Jan 05, 2020
9:29 AM


When top American military officials presented President Donald Trump with the option to kill Maj. Gen. Qassim Soleimani, Iran’s most powerful commander, they didn’t actually think he would take it, reports the New York Times. Pentagon officials usually include a far-out option when they present possibilities to the president in order to make the others seem less extreme. The other options presented to Trump in Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach resort, included strikes against Iranian ships or missile facilities or militias backed by Iran that are operating in Iraq. “The Pentagon also tacked on the choice of targeting General Suleimani, mainly to make other options seem reasonable,” reports the Times.

At first, it seemed everything was going according to plan. Trump rejected the option to kill Soleimani to respond to a wave of recent Iranian-sponsored violence in Iraq . Instead, he authorized airstrikes against an Iranian-supported militia group, Kataib Hezbollah. The strikes ended up hitting three locations in Iraq and two in Syria.

Then things changed when protesters gathered outside the U.S. embassy in Baghdad on Tuesday. Iranians saw the U.S. response as disproportionate but Trump became increasingly angry at the images he saw on television as protesters stormed the embassy. Suddenly, Trump was worried that failing to respond to the protests would look weak. By Thursday, Trump had decided to go forward with the killing of Soleimani and “top Pentagon officials were stunned,” reports the Times. CNN also reports that “some officials emerged surprised” when the president decided to target Soleimani as many expected he would go for a less risky option. There was immediate concern about what kind of retaliation that could spark from Iran, but it is unclear whether top military officials pushed back against Trump’s decision.

Although top U.S. national security officials continue to insist that the killing of Soleimani was in response to an imminent threat against Americas, there continues to be skepticism about that claim as the administration has failed to provide convincing evidence to make its case. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley also made clear that the attacks could still happen, meaning that killing Soleimani did not get rid of the supposed imminent threat. Several Democratic lawmakers have expressed skepticism at the president’s claims. “My staff was briefed by a number of people representing a variety of agencies in the United States government and they came away with no feeling that there was evidence of an imminent attack,” Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico said.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon Officials Reportedly "Stunned" by Trump's Decision to Kill Soleimani (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2020 OP
I don't believe that for a second. They knew. Autumn Jan 2020 #1
They've met Trump, right? tanyev Jan 2020 #2
Have they not been paying attention? lame54 Jan 2020 #3
They presented it to him. I doubt they were that "stunned." Hoyt Jan 2020 #4
we need to know whose bright fucking idea this was. we know he is incapable mopinko Jan 2020 #5
He went for the choice he thought would make him look strongest. Grasswire2 Jan 2020 #6
None of this smells right. It was an assassination conducted outside of declared war or AUMF. Cognitive_Resonance Jan 2020 #7
Never present an option you're unhappy to make C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #8

mopinko

(70,139 posts)
5. we need to know whose bright fucking idea this was. we know he is incapable
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:19 PM
Jan 2020

of thought. so, whose "thoughts" were these?
get the general's asses in front of congress TOMORROW.

Grasswire2

(13,571 posts)
6. He went for the choice he thought would make him look strongest.
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:31 PM
Jan 2020

Has anyone in the military done any thinking about how to contain a rogue president and manage his intentions??

JESUS.

Cognitive_Resonance

(1,546 posts)
7. None of this smells right. It was an assassination conducted outside of declared war or AUMF.
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:43 PM
Jan 2020

Leading up to the strike there must have been due diligence among DoD, IC, State, etc. It doesn't seem reasonable DoD would just go along to conduct the hit without ensuring there was substantial skin in the game.
Congress needs to grill the generals for answers...real answers, not concocted "imminent attack" cover-story bs

C_U_L8R

(45,003 posts)
8. Never present an option you're unhappy to make
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 03:46 PM
Jan 2020

If true, that’s just a dumb move on the Pentagon’s part. Worse, they went and followed through, knowing it was a stupid and illegal idea. Resign.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon Officials Report...