Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPentagon Officials Reportedly "Stunned" by Trump's Decision to Kill Soleimani
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/pentagon-officials-reportedly-stunned-trump-kill-soleimani.htmlPentagon Officials Reportedly Stunned by Trumps Decision to Kill Soleimani
By Daniel Politi
Jan 05, 2020
9:29 AM
When top American military officials presented President Donald Trump with the option to kill Maj. Gen. Qassim Soleimani, Irans most powerful commander, they didnt actually think he would take it, reports the New York Times. Pentagon officials usually include a far-out option when they present possibilities to the president in order to make the others seem less extreme. The other options presented to Trump in Mar-a-Lago, his Palm Beach resort, included strikes against Iranian ships or missile facilities or militias backed by Iran that are operating in Iraq. The Pentagon also tacked on the choice of targeting General Suleimani, mainly to make other options seem reasonable, reports the Times.
At first, it seemed everything was going according to plan. Trump rejected the option to kill Soleimani to respond to a wave of recent Iranian-sponsored violence in Iraq . Instead, he authorized airstrikes against an Iranian-supported militia group, Kataib Hezbollah. The strikes ended up hitting three locations in Iraq and two in Syria.
Then things changed when protesters gathered outside the U.S. embassy in Baghdad on Tuesday. Iranians saw the U.S. response as disproportionate but Trump became increasingly angry at the images he saw on television as protesters stormed the embassy. Suddenly, Trump was worried that failing to respond to the protests would look weak. By Thursday, Trump had decided to go forward with the killing of Soleimani and top Pentagon officials were stunned, reports the Times. CNN also reports that some officials emerged surprised when the president decided to target Soleimani as many expected he would go for a less risky option. There was immediate concern about what kind of retaliation that could spark from Iran, but it is unclear whether top military officials pushed back against Trumps decision.
Although top U.S. national security officials continue to insist that the killing of Soleimani was in response to an imminent threat against Americas, there continues to be skepticism about that claim as the administration has failed to provide convincing evidence to make its case. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Mark Milley also made clear that the attacks could still happen, meaning that killing Soleimani did not get rid of the supposed imminent threat. Several Democratic lawmakers have expressed skepticism at the presidents claims. My staff was briefed by a number of people representing a variety of agencies in the United States government and they came away with no feeling that there was evidence of an imminent attack, Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico said.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1040 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon Officials Reportedly "Stunned" by Trump's Decision to Kill Soleimani (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jan 2020
OP
None of this smells right. It was an assassination conducted outside of declared war or AUMF.
Cognitive_Resonance
Jan 2020
#7
Autumn
(45,111 posts)1. I don't believe that for a second. They knew.
tanyev
(42,573 posts)2. They've met Trump, right?
lame54
(35,295 posts)3. Have they not been paying attention?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)4. They presented it to him. I doubt they were that "stunned."
mopinko
(70,139 posts)5. we need to know whose bright fucking idea this was. we know he is incapable
of thought. so, whose "thoughts" were these?
get the general's asses in front of congress TOMORROW.
Grasswire2
(13,571 posts)6. He went for the choice he thought would make him look strongest.
Has anyone in the military done any thinking about how to contain a rogue president and manage his intentions??
JESUS.
Cognitive_Resonance
(1,546 posts)7. None of this smells right. It was an assassination conducted outside of declared war or AUMF.
Leading up to the strike there must have been due diligence among DoD, IC, State, etc. It doesn't seem reasonable DoD would just go along to conduct the hit without ensuring there was substantial skin in the game.
Congress needs to grill the generals for answers...real answers, not concocted "imminent attack" cover-story bs
C_U_L8R
(45,003 posts)8. Never present an option you're unhappy to make
If true, thats just a dumb move on the Pentagons part. Worse, they went and followed through, knowing it was a stupid and illegal idea. Resign.