Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeet the Iran Hawks Inside Trump's Administration
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/01/iran-hawks-inside-trumps-administration-mike-pompeo-bolton-robert-obrien-brian-hook/Meet the Iran Hawks Inside Trumps Administration
John Bolton earned all the headlines for his anti-Iran views, but he was never the only one.
Dan Spinelli
snip//
No other Trump administration official was willing to state the quiet part in such loud, blunt terms, but Bolton was far from alone in cheering for this particular outcome. With Bolton out of the picture, three senior officialsSecretary of State Mike Pompeo, national security adviser Robert OBrien, and diplomat Brian Hook (who is responsible for coordinating the US governments approach to Iran)have picked up where he left off, ushering in the most tense period of Iran-US relations since the 1979 revolution.
Long before he signed up with Trump, Pompeo was eager to see the US engaged in a military conflict with Iran. When talking with reporters back in 2014, Pompeo, then a member of Congress, pushed for an attack inside Iran against nuclear facilities. This is not an insurmountable task for the coalition forces, he said. Once Barack Obama reached a deal with Iran in 2015 to halt nuclear weapon production, Pompeo didnt mince words. The Iranian regime is intent on the destruction of our country, Pompeo said in a press release. Why the President does not understand is unfathomable.
Trump pulled out of Obamas nuclear deal in May 2018, giving Pompeo and the other hawks in the administration a chance to radically reshape American policy toward Iran. At a speech weeks later, Pompeo laid out 12 conditions for Iran to meet before another deal could be negotiated. These demandsend missile production, stop threatening Israel and Saudi Arabia, halt nuclear enrichment entirelywere wishful thinking. Outside of a revolution toppling Irans clerical government, it was impossible to imagine a scenario where Iran acceded to those terms.
The nuclear deal was a central, animating concern for Iran hawks in the past decade, but its far from the only complaint they have about Irans behavior. As far back as 2008, Bolton argued in favor of bombing Iranian camps that the US said were training insurgents to oppose American troops in Iraq. Pompeo, Hook, and other Iran hawks have harshly criticized the regime for supporting Shia militias in Iraq, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and other proxy groups with weapons and funding. Soleimani, the Iranian official killed by the US strike on Thursday, was the mastermind of this strategy and played a crucial role in supporting proxy groups throughout Iraq and Syria.
snip//
Like his allies in the Trump administration, OBriens criticism of Iran centered mainly on its ability to fund proxy groups in opposition to US interests. The tens of billions of dollars in sanctions relief that Iran would receive under Obamas deal would be redirected to Iranian proxies such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Assad regime in Syria, Shia militias in Iraq and Houthis rebels in Yemen, not to mention Hamas in Gaza, he wrote in 2015.
Boltons exit in September seemed like a victory for the Donald the Dove crowd, the pundits who positioned Trump as a more passive, careful corrective to Boltons warmongering. Trump has even echoed this view occasionally, telling reporters in May that he is the one that tempers Bolton and chirping on Twitter after Boltons departure that he disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the Administration. Even after he signed off on the strike to kill Soleimani, Trump tried to have it both ways Friday, claiming he doesnt want regime change for Iran while also threatening further attacks against the countrys leaders. We do not seek regime change, Trump said during a Mar-a-Lago press conference. However, the Iranian regimes aggression in the region, including use of proxy fighters to destabilize its neighbors, must end and it must end now.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 695 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meet the Iran Hawks Inside Trump's Administration (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jan 2020
OP
Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)1. The same old PNAC bullshitters...nt