General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Mideast Just Turned More Dangerous (Council of Foreign Relations)
By Steven A. Cook, CFR Expert
January 3, 2020
It seems more than likely that the Iranians will respond to this attack. That said, they will not want to confront the United States head on, especially since they have a range of asymmetric options that Irans leaders can employ over time. For example, Iran could ramp up its nuclear program and target U.S. interests in Iraq relatively quickly. It could also stir up more violence in Afghanistan, where thousands of U.S. forces remain deployed, and target Americans abroad. Tehran is also active in the cyber world. Additionally, there is the possibility of violence along the Israeli-Lebanese border stirred up by the Iran-allied Hezbollah militia. Such responses are likely to come at different times and in ways that are intended to drive home the point that even with Soleimani gone, Iran can cause great damage.
... U.S. and allied forces now face a conflict that pits them against the Islamic State and against Irans proxies in Iraq, which were also fighting the Islamic State. This problem is particularly acute in Iraq, where Irans proxies are part of the security forces, which are allegedly a U.S. partner. Donald J. Trumps administration just sent additional forces to Kuwait to be on reserve to help secure U.S. facilities in Iraq. The White House will likely need to send more forces if it plans to stay in Iraq and continue fighting the Islamic State the way it has been, under Operation Inherent Resolve, because with the killing of Soleimani, it just became more difficult.
... It is hard to imagine that any third parties have enough clout with both the United States and Iran to effectively de-escalate the situation. It also seems unlikely that the Iranian leadership could be encouraged not to respond. It is easy to understand why Americans should brace for an Iranian response: this was comparable to Iran killing a senior U.S. military commander or intelligence official. In that scenario, any U.S. president would be impervious to diplomatic entreaties and would respond violently.
https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/mideast-just-turned-more-dangerous?utm_source=tw&utm_content=010320&utm_medium=social_owned
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)A Mideast Oil and Industry person said this,the US has more than 3 thousand groups of Americans,both military and Civilian,located in various Countries in the Mid East.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Every state, county, cities, towns, etc. will now need extra intelligence concerning the chatter of real threats including cyber.