General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPorn site to pay $12.7m to women who didn't know videos would be posted
Source: The Guardian
GirlsDoPorn was sued by women who claimed they were coerced into making videos without knowing footage would be online
Harriet Grant
Fri 3 Jan 2020 15.44 GMT
Last modified on Fri 3 Jan 2020 17.06 GMT
A US judge has awarded $13m in damages to 22 women who were defrauded by the owners of GirlsDoPorn, a website specialising in amateur-style pornography.
The women were coerced and tricked into making pornography that was released on to some of the biggest adult sites in the world without their consent, leaving some of them suicidal.
The San Diego superior court heard evidence from the women, Jane Does 1 to 22, in a case their lawyers say has exposed the rotten underbelly of the San Diego sex industry.
GirlsDoPorn is an adult subscription service launched in 2006 by New Zealander Michael Pratt and operated by Ruben Garcia and Matthew Wolfe. Filmed in homes, hotels and trailer parks, videos on GirlsDoPorn specialise in promoting the image of the ordinary college girl who is making her first and only pornographic film.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/03/girlsdoporn-site-pay-127m-women-didnt-know-videos-posted
Response to Eugene (Original post)
PCIntern This message was self-deleted by its author.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)some of them became suicidal"....Still think this is funny?
PCIntern
(25,544 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)though I doubt the liberal parents you recently spoke of -- your mother especially -- would agree..
PCIntern
(25,544 posts)I just work here.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Unless you need one to understand that pushing women to the brink of suicide isn't "funny".
samnsara
(17,622 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)That day should have come in the 70's so now here we are decades later still fighting for people not to be exploited and abused by this industry.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Explain.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)hunter
(38,312 posts)This is a reflection of our misogynistic society.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)and the "providers" of this misogynisic garbage need to be punished, big time.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)...actually put them out ahead.
Its a screwed up world.
lame54
(35,290 posts)EVERYONE assume everything filmed WILL be online
hunter
(38,312 posts)Things we did when we were young may be remembered forever by the internet, but they needn't have any impact on our lives years later.
I'm not going to shame anyone, or tell them they were foolish.
Forty years ago I looked pretty damned hot wearing only a hat. A quick google search didn't turn up that photo, but I'm sure I could find it if I kept searching.
But I am embarrassed by some of the stuff I was writing back then. Hell, there's posts I've written here on DU I now find embarrassing, some of them recent.
lame54
(35,290 posts)it is wrong what was done to them
but that's no excuse to ignore reality
hunter
(38,312 posts)You can tell people "it's reality" but it's more important to recognize how society punishes victims, especially the victims of sexual predators.
We can change this social reality.
Furthermore, realistic sex education is a necessity. Too many young people are unable to recognize sexual predators.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)The hideous Double Standard. One of the Founding Fathers had something to day about it.
"Pity the Tender Sex as the have to deal with Men, who are at once, their Seducers and their Judges".
Thomas Paine