General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCLINTON’S SPEECH: THE POWER OF A HUG
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/09/bill-clinton-convention-speech-the-power-of-a-hug.htmlBill Clintons speech was excellent for all the reasons I thought Julián Castros speech the previous evening was weak. In confusing times, good leaders can help the public understand our politics, and as Obama himself has admitted, he has not always excelled at this over the last few years. But its long been Bill Clintons special gift. Indeed, Clintons frustration with his partys inability to explain whats going on politically in this country helped encourage him to write his recent book, Back To Work. (In it, he tells a story about being rebuffed when he tried to give the Democratic National Committee some advice on talking points for the 2010 election.) This was not so much a speech about Obama, but one about the choice voters face and the framework they should use in making it.
Clinton started with a favorite subject of his: the coöperation that he sees among parties trying to solve problems around the world through his work at the Clinton Global Initiative. However, here in the U.S., despite President Obamas best efforts, an unreasonable and ideological political faction has made coöperation impossible. From there he pivoted to recent history, making a seemingly dispassionate case for why no President, even Clinton himself, could ever have repaired in four years all the damage Obama found when he arrived in the White House in 2009. But despite that, Obamas record, told with excruciating but powerfully persuasive detail, has been far better than is popularly understood. Now he just needs his contract renewed to finish the job. Clinton made it all sound so simple.
This was the anti-Michelle speech. While she naturally gave personal testimony about Barack Obamas character and urged voters to support him on that basis, in the story Clinton told Obama was an ephemeral figure. There were few personal details or anecdotes about the President because Clinton isnt particularly close to Obama. It was a speech about facts and three and a half years of decisions made and outcomes achieved. By the end of it, the only logical conclusion, Clinton argued, is that Obama would do a better job than the alternative.
In a sense, Clintons reluctance to embrace Obama personally, and his own fraught history with the President, which I explored in a piece for The New Yorker this week, makes him the ideal spokesman to appeal to those skeptical former Obama voters that his campaign is trying to win back. In an interview with Brian Williams earlier in the day, Clinton said of Obama, We havent been close friends a long time or anything like that, but he knows that I support him. I found it an amazingly honest statement considering that politicians often go out of their way to exaggerate their fondness for one another.
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2012/09/bill-clinton-convention-speech-the-power-of-a-hug.html#ixzz25hFhy9GO
A great assessment.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)They're friends now.
Patiod
(11,816 posts)there are a few true "independents" or undecideds to win over.
This convention's biggest job was to remind US, the Democratic faithful, what's at stake, and to fire US up to get to work, get on the phones, get on the streets, get out the checkbook (where possible), and essentially GOTV.
Both Michelle AND The Big Dog did a great job reminding us what we're working for, and why we can't just throw up our hands.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)so clearly. He covered almost every thing. If I was an independent undecided, this speech alone would do it for me.
Uncle Joe
(58,377 posts)The former President made an excellent case in both highlighting the differences between the parties, recent history and for reelecting Obama to prevent the nation from sliding into Republican induced economic trauma.
Thanks for the thread, xchrom.