General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA President under impeachment
Should NOT have the power of pardons!
The ultimate obstruction of justice is the ability to green light lies and bullshit!
This is America?
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)There's no such thing as "under impeachment"
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)I just made it up!
Can I be president now?
fleur-de-lisa
(14,627 posts)Mike Niendorff
(3,462 posts)The moment he was impeached, everything changed:
US Constitution, Article II, Section II
MDN
tritsofme
(17,380 posts)This simply means that the presidents pardon power does not extend to impeachment proceedings.
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)It means that the president cannot pardon someone who has been impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.
A logical conclusion is that the president cannot pardon himself if he's impeached and convicted.
The clause does not limit the president's ability to pardon others convicted of crimes. That power is unfortunately unlimited.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Theres no way that the founders would have gone for a system where a small majority in one chamber of the legislative branch could remove constitutional powers.
It doesnt matter whether you want to blame senators that wont hold a fair trial or a House that wont let it start... they didnt anticipate a situation where a president could go for months as impeached, but neither removed nor acquited.
Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)The founders wanted a system where extreme change was difficult. I think they also wanted impeachment to be difficult. But the problem is that they never anticipated that congress would put their party affiliations ahead of the well being of the country.