Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A President under impeachment (Original Post) SCVDem Dec 2019 OP
Him is IMPEACHED underthematrix Dec 2019 #1
Sure there is SCVDem Dec 2019 #2
You have my vote! fleur-de-lisa Dec 2019 #3
Article II, Section II Mike Niendorff Dec 2019 #4
The House voting to impeach does not limit the president's pardon power. tritsofme Dec 2019 #5
Perhaps you're misreading that clause PJMcK Dec 2019 #8
Yes, Virginia, this is America where money talks and suckers walk. abqtommy Dec 2019 #6
The constitutional system is not the problem FBaggins Dec 2019 #7
I'm not so sure about that Buckeyeblue Dec 2019 #9

Mike Niendorff

(3,462 posts)
4. Article II, Section II
Wed Dec 25, 2019, 06:15 AM
Dec 2019

The moment he was impeached, everything changed:

US Constitution, Article II, Section II

"he shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment."



MDN

tritsofme

(17,380 posts)
5. The House voting to impeach does not limit the president's pardon power.
Wed Dec 25, 2019, 06:24 AM
Dec 2019

This simply means that the president’s pardon power does not extend to impeachment proceedings.

PJMcK

(22,037 posts)
8. Perhaps you're misreading that clause
Wed Dec 25, 2019, 09:51 AM
Dec 2019

It means that the president cannot pardon someone who has been impeached by the House and convicted by the Senate.

A logical conclusion is that the president cannot pardon himself if he's impeached and convicted.

The clause does not limit the president's ability to pardon others convicted of crimes. That power is unfortunately unlimited.

FBaggins

(26,748 posts)
7. The constitutional system is not the problem
Wed Dec 25, 2019, 07:48 AM
Dec 2019

There’s no way that the founders would have gone for a system where a small majority in one chamber of the legislative branch could remove constitutional powers.

It doesn’t matter whether you want to blame senators that won’t hold a fair trial or a House that won’t let it start... they didn’t anticipate a situation where a president could go for months as impeached, but neither removed nor acquited.

Buckeyeblue

(5,499 posts)
9. I'm not so sure about that
Wed Dec 25, 2019, 12:37 PM
Dec 2019

The founders wanted a system where extreme change was difficult. I think they also wanted impeachment to be difficult. But the problem is that they never anticipated that congress would put their party affiliations ahead of the well being of the country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A President under impeach...