General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Trump Policy 'Clarification' All but Ends Punishment for Bird Deaths
Bastards
A new interpretation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act in 2017 means that as of now, companies are no longer subject to prosecution or fines even after a disaster like the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010 that destroyed or injured about one million birds and for which BP paid $100 million in fines.
To compensate, they considered developing an artificial island as a haven. Then in June 2018, the Trump administration stepped in. While the federal government appreciates the states efforts, new rules in Washington had eliminated criminal penalties for incidental migratory bird deaths that came in the course of normal business, administration officials advised. Such conservation measures were now purely voluntary.
The state ended its island planning.
The island is one of dozens of bird-preservation efforts that have fallen away in the wake of the policy change in 2017 that was billed merely as a technical clarification to a century-old law protecting migratory birds. Across the country birds have been killed and nests destroyed by oil spills, construction crews and chemical contamination, all with no response from the federal government, according to emails, memos and other documents viewed by The New York Times.
-paywall-
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/24/climate/trump-bird-deaths.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
sakabatou
(42,155 posts)RKP5637
(67,111 posts)Backseat Driver
(4,393 posts)for protection of our wildlife
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)higher level of contempt for him but maybe someone else can.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)And wants it destroyed for the sake of destruction itself.
StClone
(11,684 posts)As a former birder I have found too many active birders to actually be closet Conservatives. They also are too busy following an ancient urge for "hoarding": AKA competitive listing where you try to see as many birds as possible in a given time and/or place. At the sighting of a rare bird, birders will think nothing of jumping in a car driving (or flying) as fast as possible, often to great distances, to see the bird for a second and jump back in their car and head off to the next rarity.
And due to constraints, bird groups go "non-profit" and can not fund political fights. So these "bird organizations" go stealth and hope for the best through education and other efforts which I have come to see as ineffectual. Experts with Masters or PhD's in fields of avian ecology, avian biology and Natural Resources are often experts with some value. But are useless as, they are often Government employees under the control of conservatives/big business. Their expertise to aid bird life is essentially neutered.
Rarely do birders, bird advocates, wildlife experts become a big visible movement to confront Conservatives/Republicans in office as a tough in-your-face force for change. If they had, as a real loud angry voice, unconcerned to be seen as fanatical, it could have made a different. As to date the quieter non-political route has not worked to curb resource management failures, pesticides use, or incoherent policies related to climate change. It's a big challenge. But one which may need stronger confrontational terms to turn the corner by those so call birders.
matt819
(10,749 posts)AnnaLee
(1,041 posts)malaise
(269,054 posts)Happy Holidays brother
spanone
(135,844 posts)needledriver
(836 posts)Are we saving birds or letting them die?
Im confused.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)ALREADY oh and Merry Christmas.