Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(46,192 posts)
Thu Dec 19, 2019, 08:28 AM Dec 2019

"Denying the votes of 63 million voters . . . . "

Let's do the math:

HRC received at least 65 million votes. That's a higher number for popular votes.

If you want to use the Electoral College standards, then Trump "won" (Roger Maris style) by only 20,000 votes over five states.

We're talking about having Trump and his minions trying to assert their authority over us because of 20,000 votes. That's all.
20,000 votes, if that. Nowhere close to 63 million, which is still a minority block of voters.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Denying the votes of 63 million voters . . . . " (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Dec 2019 OP
Look at the Wikipedia page for the 2016 election A HERETIC I AM Dec 2019 #1
That whole argument countingbluecars Dec 2019 #2

A HERETIC I AM

(24,378 posts)
1. Look at the Wikipedia page for the 2016 election
Thu Dec 19, 2019, 08:37 AM
Dec 2019

Ten million more people voted for someone OTHER than Trumpy.

Yeah, HRC beat him by 3 million, but another 7 million also thought he was the wrong choice.

countingbluecars

(4,766 posts)
2. That whole argument
Thu Dec 19, 2019, 09:19 AM
Dec 2019

against impeachment makes no sense to me. Any president who gets elected and then impeached would have received millions of votes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Denying the votes of 63 ...