I have a question, Where is Schumer? I have not seen him, I have not heard him.

[shockey80]

Did he respond to what Moscow Mitch said? Schumer better grow a pair of big balls for the Senate trial, that's all I have to say.

[HipChick]

1. Good Question..

If roles were reversed...Moscow Mitch would be on Faux News 24x7 complaining..

[marble falls]

2. Better grow? Already got. Schumer is doing just fine, thankyou.

[shockey80]

4. Schumer is my Senator. I voted for him.

I, unlike Republican voters hold the people I vote for accountable. Right now Schumer is missing in action. I want to know what he is doing and what he is going to do about a fraud trial. I am not asking too much. He should be on TV raising hell about Moscow Mitch.

[Me.]

6. He Is My Senator Too

and I worry if he has it in him to hold up our side during the I. negotiations. He has been a big disappointment to me in the past and frankly, I wish we had a different leader in the Senate

[TwilightZone]

3. He responded almost immediately.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mcconnell-work-total-coordination-white-house-impeachment-trial/story?id=67707430

Buy, hey, don't let that stop you from your outrage at his lack of "big balls".

[shockey80]

5. I never said he lacked balls. You made that up.

[TwilightZone]

7. Try using Google

In the ten seconds it took you to write your post of outrage, you could have found the answer to your question.

These thinly-veiled attacks on Democrats who are clearly doing their jobs are beyond tiresome.

[shockey80]

8. You had to use google to find a response. You made my case.

[lunatica]

9. That's like saying you had to go to the library to find facts?

Unbelievable! Google is the best research tool ever developed.

Try it. It’s really a good source.

[shockey80]

13. You are missing the point.

You should not have to search for a response from Schumer. He should be on all the cable networks raising hell. I just asked a question, where the hell is Schumer.

By the way we are Democrats not Republicans. We challenge, hold accountable our politicians. If we don't do that we are just like the Trump voters.

[lunatica]

20. And you obviously missed my point

I was challenging your assumption that the poster using Google to find facts is somehow a bad thing. Just because you lose an argument doesn’t mean you have to keep making the same argument by denigrating your opponent’s methods of finding facts.

[CatWoman]

25. you two are cracking me up

I really needed that

[lunatica]

28. My pleasure.

[TeamPooka]

10. No he didn't and you said this:"Schumer better grow a pair of big balls for the Senate trial,"

We accept your apology.

[StarfishSaver]

11. How do you normally get your news?

[shockey80]

15. From you.

[StarfishSaver]

17. People who get their news from me are well-informed.

So, no, that can't be it.

[Polybius]

33. Then blame the media

Not Schumer's fault if no one's reporting it.

[jberryhill]

37. Bwahahahahahaha

Could have chipped a fingernail.

[MineralMan]

12. You asked where he was. That link tells you where he is.

You just didn't know that. You weren't paying close attention, apparently. Chuck Schumer was very clear.

When you say things like you said, you have to expect that someone will quote the person you're going after, doing exactly what you said he's not doing. As for balls, here's exactly what you said in your opening post: "Schumer better grow a pair of big balls for the Senate trial, that's all I have to say." Now you're claiming you didn't say that?

Embarrassing, isn't it?

[shockey80]

16. I stick with that statement. He better grow a big pair of balls for the trial.

If you take that as an attack, that's your fucking problem, not mine.

[MineralMan]

19. No, it's not my "fucking problem" at all.

I don't have a "fucking problem." You're still ignoring the fact that he made a clear statement about the impeachment trial. You just didn't see it. You didn't look for it, either, apparently. Instead, you came here and trashed him.

You do you.

[shockey80]

34. Are you kidding me?

My post was a simple question about Schumer. You turned into something else. You are doing what Trump voters do. Attack anyone who even mentions something that may make a Democrat look bad. You found a statement on google, the point I was making is Schumer should be on all the networks raising hell. I simply asked, where is he and you turned into a Trump like voter who attacks their own.

[MineralMan]

35. Uh-huh...OK, then...

Lovely personal attack, there...

[treestar]

39. You had earlier made "attacking their own" a virtue

We are Democrats, and we challenge our people, including ourselves, I would hope.

[USALiberal]

31. Wow, not going well for you! nt

[OnDoutside]

32. You made shit up against Shockey, but to be fair, Schumer

Has been pretty conspicuous by his absence, compared to Pelosi.

[secondwind]

14. Jewish holidays have been around this time, I suspect Schumer will pop up soon enough.

[StarfishSaver]

18. It's a little tiring hearing people ask where someone is when they haven't bothered to look

and assume that if the MSM hasn't made the editorial decision to report what they said, they didn t say anything.

[shockey80]

22. It's a little tiring hearing from people who think they smarter than everyone else.

[StarfishSaver]

24. I understand why some people feel that way.

Knowledge can be intimidating.

[shockey80]

29. The truth can also be intimidating.

[MineralMan]

26. Or from people who know how to type Schumer Impeachment into Google?

That turns up all kinds of things in Google News. Schumer has said a lot.

One doesn't have to be "smarter than everyone else" to do a simple Google search to see what the media tells us about Schumer and Impeachment.

So, you're tired of hearing from people who know how to look for information they want to see? Well, now...

[Hekate]

38. This entire thread from your OP on down has been a reminder...

...of why I bypass 99.9% of your posts.

[cwydro]

40. Lol, sometimes the amusement value is worth it.

Numerous posters have pointed out why his attack on a Dem is groundless, yet still he persists.

[kentuck]

21. I have wondered about Schumer also?

We don't see a lot from him on TV? Maybe they just choose not to show him.

I cannot understand why he and McConnell have not been negotiating the rules already?

I can't think of any reason he would be hiding?

[shockey80]

23. Thank you, you get it.

[Iwasthere]

27. I also wonder where he's been

And yes, he's going to need an Extra big set of balls.

[Historic NY]

30. He's been responding almost daily.....

[MineralMan]

36. But, see, that doesn't matter, because...well...reasons...

A Google news search demonstrates exactly what you said, but you have to do the search. His comments have been reported in all of the major media. Someone's not paying attention, though, apparently.

[madinmaryland]

41. I think the Democratic senators radio silence is well planned.

What should they be saying? Let it play out in the house. #moscowmitch shoots his mouth off daily revealing all of their schemes.

They should not be adding any distractions!