Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNBCnews: Democrats question why DOJ IG not investigating Barr.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/democrats-question-why-doj-inspector-general-isn-t-investigating-trump-n1090666"While inspectors general at other major cabinet agencies have conducted high profile investigations of Trump appointees, the Justice Department's Michael Horowitz appointed by President Obama in 2012 and confirmed by the Senate has not. Trump's three attorney general appointees Jeff Sessions, Matthew Whitaker and William Barr have each escaped serious scrutiny from an inspector general who investigated Eric Holder, Obama's first attorney general, and many of his top deputies. It's a record that puzzles his allies and infuriates critics.
"I don't have so much of a problem with Horowitz investigating some of the allegations surrounding the 2016 election, because that's his job," said Matthew Miller, a Democratic former DOJ spokesman and NBC News legal analyst. "But it is striking to me that with all of Barr's known misconduct, all of the instances of conversations between senior leadership and the White House, there doesn't seem to have been a single investigation into any that." "
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 2336 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (45)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NBCnews: Democrats question why DOJ IG not investigating Barr. (Original Post)
triron
Nov 2019
OP
... or is he just part of the 'bought off' crew now surrounding Trump? What do they have on him?
NotHardly
Nov 2019
#4
Perhaps he's part of the crowd in NY that never seemed to investigate rump and ...
SWBTATTReg
Nov 2019
#5
uponit7771
(90,356 posts)1. K&R, Someone needs to investigate the IG then ... this is disgusting.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)2. Cover up . .
Criminal Barr falsified the Mueller report and denied and covered up the WB's complaint with the help of the IG.
triron
(22,011 posts)3. So is Horowitz being coerced?
NotHardly
(1,062 posts)4. ... or is he just part of the 'bought off' crew now surrounding Trump? What do they have on him?
Texin
(2,597 posts)6. The Russians, i.e., Putin-Trump must have something on him.
Think about it. He's a formerly appointed IG by Obama. tRump would ordinarily have summarily fired him when he came in. I think there must be something that Putin gave to tRump on this guy which was imminently more valuable to him than simply firing him and replacing him with an unknown quantity, even one of tRump's "friends". By leaving him in place, it provides additional cover, because tRump has fired anyone Obama appointed.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,400 posts)8. makes sense. TrumPutin has been on a crusade to undo everything Obama
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)5. Perhaps he's part of the crowd in NY that never seemed to investigate rump and ...
cronies earlier. People have remarked that a lot of crap that rump did back then seemed to escape notice. Wonder who got brought out, eh?
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)7. What is going on here? Crooked IG ?
Texin
(2,597 posts)10. Krompomat on him and it's leveraged against him for Putin-tRump.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)9. Almost like a giant FU to the person and/or the person's party who appointed him.
The question is why.