Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

triron

(22,011 posts)
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 11:55 AM Nov 2019

NBCnews: Democrats question why DOJ IG not investigating Barr.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/democrats-question-why-doj-inspector-general-isn-t-investigating-trump-n1090666

"While inspectors general at other major cabinet agencies have conducted high profile investigations of Trump appointees, the Justice Department's Michael Horowitz — appointed by President Obama in 2012 and confirmed by the Senate — has not. Trump's three attorney general appointees — Jeff Sessions, Matthew Whitaker and William Barr — have each escaped serious scrutiny from an inspector general who investigated Eric Holder, Obama's first attorney general, and many of his top deputies. It's a record that puzzles his allies and infuriates critics.

"I don't have so much of a problem with Horowitz investigating some of the allegations surrounding the 2016 election, because that's his job," said Matthew Miller, a Democratic former DOJ spokesman and NBC News legal analyst. "But it is striking to me that with all of Barr's known misconduct, all of the instances of conversations between senior leadership and the White House, there doesn't seem to have been a single investigation into any that." "
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
2. Cover up . .
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 12:06 PM
Nov 2019

Criminal Barr falsified the Mueller report and denied and covered up the WB's complaint with the help of the IG.

Texin

(2,597 posts)
6. The Russians, i.e., Putin-Trump must have something on him.
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 02:44 PM
Nov 2019

Think about it. He's a formerly appointed IG by Obama. tRump would ordinarily have summarily fired him when he came in. I think there must be something that Putin gave to tRump on this guy which was imminently more valuable to him than simply firing him and replacing him with an unknown quantity, even one of tRump's "friends". By leaving him in place, it provides additional cover, because tRump has fired anyone Obama appointed.

SWBTATTReg

(22,156 posts)
5. Perhaps he's part of the crowd in NY that never seemed to investigate rump and ...
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 02:42 PM
Nov 2019

cronies earlier. People have remarked that a lot of crap that rump did back then seemed to escape notice. Wonder who got brought out, eh?

Doremus

(7,261 posts)
9. Almost like a giant FU to the person and/or the person's party who appointed him.
Wed Nov 27, 2019, 04:28 PM
Nov 2019

The question is why.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NBCnews: Democrats questi...