Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

imanamerican63

(13,808 posts) Sun Nov 10, 2019, 01:31 PM Nov 2019

Here is a thought?

The GOPers want the whistle blower to testify. What if the whistle blower already did? What would they do then?

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here is a thought? (Original Post) imanamerican63 Nov 2019 OP

You're right. That IS a thought! dchill Nov 2019 #1

This had occurred to me, too cyclonefence Nov 2019 #2

dchill

(38,516 posts)

1. You're right. That IS a thought!

Reply to imanamerican63 (Original post)

Sun Nov 10, 2019, 01:47 PM

Nov 2019

cyclonefence

(4,483 posts)

2. This had occurred to me, too

Reply to imanamerican63 (Original post)

Sun Nov 10, 2019, 02:21 PM

Nov 2019

because everything the whistleblower said has been testified to by multiple other people. If it were not for the right-wing crazies who might (make that *would*) harm this person and/or family, there's really no reason for Trump to demand identification, or, in a perfect world, to have to shield him/her.

In fact, except for RW revenge fantasies, it seems to me that there's no longer any reason for the whistleblower even to have to testify.

Reply to this discussion