Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 05:41 PM Oct 2019

Fux Noise: Trump judicial pick breaks down in tears at hearing

One of President Trump's nominees for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals broke down in tears during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing Wednesday, as he disputed suggestions that he would not be fair to members of the LGBTQ community.

Lawrence VanDyke was the subject of a scathing letter from the American Bar Association, sent to committee leadership Tuesday night, which alleged that people they interviewed expressed this concern, and that VanDyke himself "would not say affirmatively that he would be fair to any litigant before him, notably members of the LGBTQ community."

-snip-

VanDyke also said that he was not given a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations during his ABA interview. He said when he was confronted with the concerns about his views, he began to answer but was told they were running out of time.

-snip-

The paragraph preceding the questioning of his attitude toward LGBTQ litigants included a list of other complaints against VanDyke, attributed to "the assessments of interviewees," without detailing who or how many.

"Mr. VanDyke’s accomplishments are offset by the assessments of interviewees that Mr. VanDyke is arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice including procedural rules," it said, explaining why despite his professional and academic experience, they gave him a "Not Qualified" rating. "There was a theme that the nominee lacks humility, has an 'entitlement' temperament, does not have an open mind, and does not always have a commitment to being candid and truthful."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-judicial-pick-breaks-down-in-tears-at-hearing-over-legal-groups-attack/ar-AAJBsFS?li=BBnb7Kz

Trumpy sure knows how to pick 'em.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fux Noise: Trump judicial pick breaks down in tears at hearing (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2019 OP
So has he been seated on the court yet? He won't be the first nominee who wasn't Vinca Oct 2019 #1
My guess is that Republicans will confirm him regardless. Arkansas Granny Oct 2019 #2
Another nominee rated "Not Qualified" gratuitous Oct 2019 #3
Oh Boo Hoo BigDemVoter Oct 2019 #4
Considering that emotionality was the reason cited as to why women weren't capable of voting intheflow Oct 2019 #5
Right up there with the boofer Brett on SCOTUS. EOM TruckFump Oct 2019 #6
Bwah‐‐‐-‐ almost makes me want to support him!1 UTUSN Oct 2019 #7
Rachel had this video on her show tonight shanti Oct 2019 #8

Vinca

(50,271 posts)
1. So has he been seated on the court yet? He won't be the first nominee who wasn't
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 05:43 PM
Oct 2019

qualified to be voted into a lifetime position.

Arkansas Granny

(31,516 posts)
2. My guess is that Republicans will confirm him regardless.
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 05:54 PM
Oct 2019

Just another way to thumb their nose at Democrats.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. Another nominee rated "Not Qualified"
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 06:03 PM
Oct 2019

Only the best people, right Trump's fanboiz?

But VanDyke breaking down like that is the sort of thing Trump just hates. Maybe he won't clear the committee after all? (And no, I wouldn't bet a plugged nickel on the proposition.)

intheflow

(28,473 posts)
5. Considering that emotionality was the reason cited as to why women weren't capable of voting
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 07:24 PM
Oct 2019

for a couple centuries, this rash of crying white men should just excuse themselves now for being too hysterical.

shanti

(21,675 posts)
8. Rachel had this video on her show tonight
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 10:16 PM
Oct 2019

I was going to say I've never see a judge blubber like that, but then I remember Kavanaugh. Van Dyke was disgusting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fux Noise: Trump judicial...