Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MissMillie

(38,557 posts)
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 03:30 PM Oct 2019

Is anyone else surprised...?

Lt. Col. Vindman says that the official transcript of the 7/25 telephone call is not an accurate transcript.

Haven't we seen this before?

And doesn't the Presidential Records Act apply to any of this? And isn't a violation of that Act against the law?

And isn't THAT an impeachable offense?


7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. Once more for the folks in the back
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 04:05 PM
Oct 2019

The "official transcript" is currently under lock and key by the Trump administration. The heavily barbered document the administration released is a compilation of various memoranda of the call. It's not a transcript. Certainly the administration is heavily invested in pretending that the call memorandum is a full transcript, but it isn't. For some reason unclear to me, the media have bought into calling the not-a-transcript a transcript, even though they clearly know the difference. Unless the mix-up is deliberate, and this is the media's effort at confusing the public; but that's not really what they claim to be their mission.

Trump continues to insist that his July 25 phone call was "perfect," whatever that's supposed to mean in his worm-riddled brain. Yet he refuses to release the actual transcript of the call, and because of the media's failure to use accurate language, nobody is pressuring Trump to release the transcript because they think they've already gotten it.

What is being peddled as the transcript is no such thing.

Nitram

(22,801 posts)
5. I think there were suggestions from the beginning that it might be an edited and/or incomplete
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 06:20 PM
Oct 2019

version of the conversation. But I'm glad to hear that the redactions may be very significant, and we have a witness to bear testimony to that.

krkaufman

(13,435 posts)
6. "Haven't we seen this before?" Yes.
Wed Oct 30, 2019, 06:26 PM
Oct 2019

“Haven't we seen this before?“

Yes.

Doctored story Re: Trump Tower meeting, Bill Barr’s misleading summary of Mueller report, off the top of my head.

wnylib

(21,465 posts)
7. I am guessing that the reference to seeing
Fri Nov 1, 2019, 12:25 AM
Nov 2019

this before is to the 18 missing minutes from the Nixon tape. Another crooked Republican who needed impeachment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is anyone else surprised....