Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,846 posts)
Mon Oct 28, 2019, 06:04 PM Oct 2019

Trigger Warning * Nudity/ Violence. We have our Nero.

The picture is frightening because it touches on the truth.



Picture found here: http://all-hat-no-cattle.blogspot.com/2019/10/trump-boos-reached-almost-100-decibels.html

………………………..



The Great Fire of Rome
-
Background


snip

Nero became the emperor of Rome at age 16. Several years later, Nero had his power-hungry mother moved to a separate residence; shortly thereafter, he allegedly had her killed. There was no end to Nero’s ambition. One of his grandest plans was to tear down a third of Rome so that he could build an elaborate series of palaces that would be known as Neropolis. The senate, however, objected ardently to this proposal. Exactly what happened next has remained a mystery for nearly 2,000 years.

On the night of July 19, 64 A.D., a fire broke out among the shops lining the Circus Maximus, Rome’s mammoth chariot stadium. In a city of two million, there was nothing unusual about such a fire — the sweltering summer heat kindled conflagrations around Rome on a regular basis, particularly in the slums that covered much of the city. Knowing this, Nero himself was miles away in the cooler coastal resort of Antium. Yet this was no ordinary fire. The flames raged for six days before coming under control; then the fire reignited and burned for another three. When the smoke cleared, 10 of Rome’s 14 districts were in ruin. The 800-year-old Temple of Jupiter Stator and the Atrium Vestae, the hearth of the Vestal Virgins, were gone. Two thirds of Rome had been destroyed.

snip

History has blamed Nero for the disaster, implying that he started the fire so that he could bypass the senate and rebuild Rome to his liking. Much of what is known about the great fire of Rome comes from the aristocrat and historian Tacitus, who claimed that Nero watched Rome burn while merrily playing his fiddle. Gangs of thugs prevented citizens from fighting the fire with threats of torture, Tacitus wrote. There is some support for the theory that Nero leveled the city on purpose: the Domus Aurea, Nero’s majestic series of villas and pavilions set upon a landscaped park and a man-made lake, was built in the wake of the fire.

snip

Tacitus was a member of this Roman elite, and whether there is a bias in his writing is difficult to know. Indeed, Tacitus was still a boy at the time of the fire, and he would have been a young teenager in 68 A.D., when Nero died. Nero himself blamed the fire on an obscure new Jewish religious sect called the Christians, whom he indiscriminately and mercilessly crucified. During gladiator matches he would feed Christians to lions, and he often lit his garden parties with the burning carcasses of Christian human torches. Yet there is evidence that, in 64 A.D., many Roman Christians believed in prophecies predicting that Rome would soon be destroyed by fire. Perhaps the fire was set off by someone hoping to make the prediction come true.

https://www.pbs.org/wnet/secrets/great-fire-rome-background/1446/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trigger Warning * Nudity/ Violence. We have our Nero. (Original Post) sheshe2 Oct 2019 OP
Oh Man - never gonna be able to "unsee" that!! donkeypoofed Oct 2019 #1
Be glad he's not facing us. Dagstead Bumwood Oct 2019 #2
That I did. sheshe2 Oct 2019 #4
There's some good history here but it's missing some defacto7 Oct 2019 #3
Tacitus, that is all in the article I posted. sheshe2 Oct 2019 #5
True. Let's make sure he doesn't. defacto7 Oct 2019 #6

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
3. There's some good history here but it's missing some
Mon Oct 28, 2019, 06:31 PM
Oct 2019

important points. Many scholars are pretty sure Tacitus was biased in favor of the Senate and the elite of Rome both of whom were enemies of Nero. Nero did heinous things to Christians and non christians alike but wasn’t nearly as vicious against Christians as were some later emperors. It's more likely he took advantage of the situation to build his golden palace but unlikely that he torched Rome for that purpose.
BTW, fiddles weren't invented for another 1200 years or so. He played a Lyre which is like a small harp. He prided himself as a musician which is one of the reasons he was hated by the elites. Musicians were considered lower than the lowest gladiator, scum.

sheshe2

(83,846 posts)
5. Tacitus, that is all in the article I posted.
Mon Oct 28, 2019, 06:42 PM
Oct 2019

Though, true or not, the two stories mirror one another. TBH, trRump has not set fire to congress either...yet.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trigger Warning * Nudity/...