General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSpeaker Pelosi statement: This resolution establishes the procedure for hearings
Link to tweet
TEXT
Nancy Pelosi
✔
@SpeakerPelosi
The House has been following the facts and the evidence has only made the Presidents own words on his call more appalling. This resolution will set up the structure for the next phase where the American people can hear those facts for themselves in open hearings. #TruthExposed
"This resolution establishes the procedure for hearings that are open to the American people, authorizes the disclosure of deposition transcripts, outlines procedures to transfer evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers potential articles of impeachment, and sets forth due process rights for the President and his Counsel."
1,260
5:29 PM - Oct 28, 2019
So it will be a vote for the rules for the next phase of their process.
ETA - Adam Schiff tweet -
Link to tweet
TEXT
Adam Schiff
✔
@RepAdamSchiff
This week, we're voting to establish the format for open hearings that will be conducted as part of the impeachment inquiry.
The American people will hear firsthand about the President's misconduct.
3,634
5:31 PM - Oct 28, 2019
HERE IS THE "DEAR COLLEAGUE" LETTER
October 28, 2019
Press Release
H. Res. ___ Directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes.
***
Dear Democratic Colleague,
For weeks, the President, his Counsel in the White House, and his allies in Congress have made the baseless claim that the House of Representatives impeachment inquiry lacks the necessary authorization for a valid impeachment proceeding. They argue that, because the House has not taken a vote, they may simply pretend the impeachment inquiry does not exist.
Of course, this argument has no merit. The Constitution provides that the House of Representatives shall have the sole Power of Impeachment. Multiple past impeachments have gone forward without any authorizing resolutions. Just last week, a federal court confirmed that the House is not required to hold a vote and that imposing such a requirement would be an impermissible intrusion on the Houses constitutional authority. More than 300 legal scholars have also refuted this argument, concluding that the Constitution does not mandate the process for impeachment and there is no constitutional requirement that the House of Representatives authorize an impeachment inquiry before one begins.
The Trump Administration has made up this argument apparently out of whole cloth in order to justify its unprecedented cover-up, withhold key documents from multiple federal agencies, prevent critical witnesses from cooperating, and defy duly authorized subpoenas.
This week, we will bring a resolution to the Floor that affirms the ongoing, existing investigation that is currently being conducted by our committees as part of this impeachment inquiry, including all requests for documents, subpoenas for records and testimony, and any other investigative steps previously taken or to be taken as part of this investigation.
This resolution establishes the procedure for hearings that are open to the American people, authorizes the disclosure of deposition transcripts, outlines procedures to transfer evidence to the Judiciary Committee as it considers potential articles of impeachment, and sets forth due process rights for the President and his Counsel.
We are taking this step to eliminate any doubt as to whether the Trump Administration may withhold documents, prevent witness testimony, disregard duly authorized subpoenas, or continue obstructing the House of Representatives.
Nobody is above the law.
best regards,
https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/102819-0
Gothmog
(145,479 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,304 posts)Was waiting for/hunting for that "Dear Colleague" letter!
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)a corner at every key turn. No wonder they dislike her so much. We are lucky to have her as Speaker.
Gothmog
(145,479 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)If they vote Yes, they're acknowledging this is an official impeachment. If they vote no, they're acknowledging they're full of shish (which most of us already know, but so nice of them to admit it).
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Let's see what reasons the conjure up for voting against open hearings, after they cried like babies for them.
Phoenix61
(17,009 posts)Gaetz and his cronies were whining about the hearings not being open to the public. They are going to have a hard time bitching about them being open.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Blecht
(3,803 posts)They'll find a way to complain in no time.
blogslut
(38,007 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,304 posts)And here is the House Rules Committee announcement for their markup meeting to be held this Wednesday -
The Committee on Rules will meet on Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 3:00 PM in H-313, The Capitol on the following measure:
H. Res. ___ Directing certain committees to continue their ongoing investigations as part of the existing House of Representatives inquiry into whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to exercise its Constitutional power to impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America, and for other purposes. (Original Jurisdiction Markup)
Created: Oct 28, 2019
https://rules.house.gov/news/announcement/meeting-announcement-h-res-directing-certain-committees-continue-their-ongoing
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,786 posts)But then, Barr has no jurisdiction regarding what takes place in the Legislative Branch of Government. Nor could Trump issue such a demand. But that does not mean he won't try.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)shut these hearings down.
onenote
(42,737 posts)He'll order folks to continue not cooperating. But that's about all he can do. And if/when the courts find that the subpoenas are valid, he'll have to make a decision whether to openly defy not only the legislative branch but the judiciary or to cave in.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Bettie
(16,118 posts)but who would enforce that action? Who would come and arrest members of congress for doing their jobs?
dweller
(23,649 posts)well f'n trick or treat repugs and dotard !
BOO !
✌🏼
BumRushDaShow
(129,304 posts)dweller
(23,649 posts)i'm post #13 ! 🤣
✌🏼
BumRushDaShow
(129,304 posts)mcar
(42,366 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,304 posts)FINALLY!
(and he is here in Philly too at the Constitution Center )