Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,022 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 09:25 PM Jan 2012

Music To My War-Weary Ears... Obama: the US can no longer fight the world's battles

Obama: the US can no longer fight the world's battles
President plans to cut half a million troops and says US can't afford to wage two wars at once

The mighty American military machine that has for so long secured the country's status as the world's only superpower will have to be drastically reduced, Barack Obama warned yesterday as he set out a radical but more modest new set of priorities for the Pentagon over the next decade.

After the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that defined the first decade of the 21st century, Mr Obama's blueprint for the military's future acknowledged that America will no longer have the resources to conduct two such major operations simultaneously.

Instead, the US military will lose up to half a million troops and will focus on countering terrorism and meeting the new challenges of an emergent Asia dominated by China. America, the President said, was "turning the page on a decade of war" and now faced "a moment of transition". The country's armed forces would in future be leaner but, Mr Obama pointedly warned both friends and foes, sufficient to preserve US military superiority over any rival – "agile, flexible and ready for the full range of contingencies and threats".

..............................

the rest:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/obama-the-us-can-no-longer-fight-the-worlds-battles-6285629.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Music To My War-Weary Ears... Obama: the US can no longer fight the world's battles (Original Post) kpete Jan 2012 OP
Oh, but I thought he was going to wage war on Syria and Iran. tabatha Jan 2012 #1
*crickets* Muskypundit Jan 2012 #2
This won't be easy. The Doctor. Jan 2012 #3
Please lets call it what it is ,Tell him we orpupilofnature57 Jan 2012 #4
We couldn't protect Jack hootinholler Jan 2012 #8
Your right ,TPTB know only $$$$$$$ orpupilofnature57 Jan 2012 #11
The budget can be cut many times over.... evrstrong Jan 2012 #5
We NEVER did conduct "two such major operations simultaneously." The Colonel on MSNBC today pointed Pirate Smile Jan 2012 #6
We STARTED the last two. MichiganVote Jan 2012 #7
The interview with Panetta on The Newshour was pathetic. DCKit Jan 2012 #9
dicentes pax pax et non erat pax JVS Jan 2012 #10
The most overlooked fact of the last decade of US wars... Bonobo Jan 2012 #12
 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
3. This won't be easy.
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 09:32 PM
Jan 2012

I'm afraid it might give Republicans the fodder they need to whip up their imbecile base.
 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
4. Please lets call it what it is ,Tell him we
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 09:37 PM
Jan 2012

will Protect you from the Powers that be ,put your faith in Us , Mr President.

evrstrong

(81 posts)
5. The budget can be cut many times over....
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jan 2012

.....we still have the capacity to take over the world and wreak havoc!

I'm not jumping up and down.....Obama already outlined this on his website in a speech he gave called "The War We Need To Win",in which he outlined his dream for a more streamlined, smarter, more stealth, etc...military.

Here is an excerpt from the speech given August 7, 2007:

I will not hesitate to use military force to take out terrorists who pose a direct threat to America. This requires a broader set of capabilities, as outlined in the Army and Marine Corps's new counter-insurgency manual. I will ensure that our military becomes more stealth, agile, and lethal in its ability to capture or kill terrorists. We need to recruit, train, and equip our armed forces to better target terrorists, and to help foreign militaries to do the same. This must include a program to bolster our ability to speak different languages, understand different cultures, and coordinate complex missions with our civilian agencies.

To succeed, we must improve our civilian capacity. The finest military in the world is adapting to the challenges of the 21st century. But it cannot counter insurgent and terrorist threats without civilian counterparts who can carry out economic and political reconstruction missions -- sometimes in dangerous places. As President, I will strengthen these civilian capacities, recruiting our best and brightest to take on this challenge. I will increase both the numbers and capabilities of our diplomats, development experts, and other civilians who can work alongside our military. We can't just say there is no military solution to these problems. We need to integrate all aspects of American might.

One component of this integrated approach will be new Mobile Development Teams that bring together personnel from the State Department, the Pentagon, and USAID. These teams will work with civil society and local governments to make an immediate impact in peoples' lives, and to turn the tide against extremism. Where people are most vulnerable, where the light of hope has grown dark, and where we are in a position to make a real difference in advancing security and opportunity -- that is where these teams will go.

I will also strengthen our intelligence. This is about more than an organizational chart. We need leadership that forces our agencies to share information, and leadership that never -- ever -- twists the facts to support bad policies. But we must also build our capacity to better collect and analyze information, and to carry out operations to disrupt terrorist plots and break up terrorist networks.

~~~~~~~~~~

Oh yes, he had a vision of his stab at being Commander In Chief!












Pirate Smile

(27,617 posts)
6. We NEVER did conduct "two such major operations simultaneously." The Colonel on MSNBC today pointed
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 09:41 PM
Jan 2012

that out. When the Iraq War was hot - all the fire power was shifted there and Afghanistan was put on hold & it regressed with the Taliban taking back control over major parts of the Country.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
9. The interview with Panetta on The Newshour was pathetic.
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 01:04 AM
Jan 2012

1) Bogymen are everywhere. We need to be on the alert, staffed and ready for every possible contingency ever dreamed of.
2) We need to maintain our military to a level that would allow wars on two fronts, at all times.
3) We need to rely more on an increased National Guard to provide extra cannon fodder on an as-needed basis (Really scary, if you're one of those (us) who imagines a day when the Nat. Guard will be mobilized against the 99% to protect the 1%).

I say "Screw it. Let's close half our foreign bases and see how much that saves, then go from there. Let NATO, the UN and our other allies pick up some of the slack of being the world's policemen."

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
12. The most overlooked fact of the last decade of US wars...
Fri Jan 6, 2012, 08:49 AM
Jan 2012

is that it has counter-productively reduced our security in at least two ways:

1. It has demonstrated that the US is a paper tiger.

2. It has increased the number of people who hate the US and wish to do it harm.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Music To My War-Weary Ear...