Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRichard Roeper: The fears and loathing in ‘2016: Obama’s America’
http://www.suntimes.com/news/roeper/14831333-452/the-fears-and-loathing-in-2016-obamas-america.htmlDespite DSouzas hokey re-enactments and a heavy-handed and often desultory tone, 2016 has become a surprise success story, expanding from a single theater in Houston to 1,747 screens and taking in more than $18.3 million. (Among the backers of the $2.5 million movie: Joe Ricketts, who contributed $125,000 to the marketing campaign.)
The success comes despite mostly scathing reviews from that left-leaning, lamestream liberal media and fact-checked articles that cast serious doubts about some of the films claims. (Before we proceed: yes, I have criticized Michael Moore for the grandstanding, time-shifting, sometimes fact-challenged theatrics in his films.) As the Associated Press has pointed out, DSouza talks about Obama returning a bust of Winston Churchill to the British as if it were an act of disrespect to our ally, even though the bust was on loan to the Bush administration and was scheduled to be returned. The film also faults Obama for the escalation of the national debt (certainly true) but fails to mention the Bush administrations role in that escalation; claims Obama is sympathetic to jihadists in Pakistan and Afghanistan but never mentions the killing of bin Laden, and paints slanted, incomplete pictures of Obamas views on the Falklands and Irans nuclear ambitions.
-snip-
At times 2016 plays like a parody of an anti-Obama film. Ominous music, visuals of storm clouds gathering, a map showing the Middle East becoming The United States of Islam, split-screen images of the White House and the shack in Nairobi that houses Obamas half-brother.
-snip-
Despite the unsophisticated production values, wild leaps of logic and speculative psychoanalysis, 2016: Obamas America is clearly succeeding at reaching an audience desirous of having its worst suspicions about Obama confirmed. If you really believe every ounce of this film, you must be getting ready to pack your bags and exit this country if the unthinkable happens and a duped electorate votes to retain the president and accelerate the destruction of America.
Emphasis added.
It would be nice if everyone who believed that stupid film would leave the country.
OTOH, I can't imagine another country welcoming them...
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1457 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Richard Roeper: The fears and loathing in ‘2016: Obama’s America’ (Original Post)
highplainsdem
Sep 2012
OP
Still waiting for these bigmouths to actually point out the "fact-challenged theatrics"...
BlueStater
Sep 2012
#3
Tom Ripley
(4,945 posts)1. D’Souza has not progressed beyond his undergraduate days...
spent earning a BA in English during the 80s.
His critical theory classes are why he spends so much time obsessing over the difference between "from" and "of"
and his post-colonial lit classes are responsible for his anti-anti-colonialist theme.
pscot
(21,024 posts)2. Eight bucks at the Regal
with the senior discount. It's probably been seen by a couple million people. Sadly, it's gonna make that asshole Dinesh rich.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)3. Still waiting for these bigmouths to actually point out the "fact-challenged theatrics"...
...in Moore's films.