Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
does anybody know of any downside (Original Post) choie Oct 2019 OP
Maybe Timewas Oct 2019 #1
Possibly a more pertinent question: What would the upside be? htuttle Oct 2019 #2
Chill. we can do it Oct 2019 #3
Yes intrepidity Oct 2019 #4
Trump will consider it a win and only ask for more. spanone Oct 2019 #5
Yes Leith Oct 2019 #6
I think she's trying to protect D seats in moderate or red areas. NCLefty Oct 2019 #7
The GOP will just move the goalposts Retrograde Oct 2019 #8
Trump will just keep making up bullshit "rules" dalton99a Oct 2019 #9
Yes... lame54 Oct 2019 #10
Of course not. The tremendous plus is that the country Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2019 #11
I'm nearly certain that the IMMEDIATE response to such a vote... Silent3 Oct 2019 #12

Timewas

(2,195 posts)
1. Maybe
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 06:55 PM
Oct 2019

It may be that she has some hope to get a few repugs involved, it would definitely look better if it were not just dems voting for.

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
2. Possibly a more pertinent question: What would the upside be?
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 06:55 PM
Oct 2019

There's no reason to take up challenges demanded by the opposition if you have no reason to.

There's no requirement for it. There's nothing to be gained from it.

Every vote spends political capital. Why spend it if you don't need to.

What they should be doing is flooding the airwaves with issue ads about Trump's lack of a foreign policy and enriching himself.


Leith

(7,809 posts)
6. Yes
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 07:33 PM
Oct 2019

The Democrats would be giving in to agent orange's silly games. There is no requirement for the investigation to be public at this stage. There is no precedent for it: the rethugs didn't do it when investigating Clinton. It was not done when the Watergate crime spree was being investigated.

rethugs are metaphorically throwing chum and mud into the waters. Speaker Pelosi isn't falling for it.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
7. I think she's trying to protect D seats in moderate or red areas.
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 09:50 PM
Oct 2019

I don't think it's much more than that, on our side.

Retrograde

(10,137 posts)
8. The GOP will just move the goalposts
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 10:08 PM
Oct 2019

and demand something else. Pelosi knows how to deal with children.

dalton99a

(81,515 posts)
9. Trump will just keep making up bullshit "rules"
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 10:12 PM
Oct 2019

Good thing she said no. She is in charge of the House.

lame54

(35,293 posts)
10. Yes...
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 10:26 PM
Oct 2019

Been trying to follow but I think once the vote is taken the repugs get to get involved in the investigation

And if the actual impeachment vote is taken they'll rush it through the trial and acquit him before the public learns the full story

Plus holding off shows Trump he's not in charge

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
11. Of course not. The tremendous plus is that the country
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 10:31 PM
Oct 2019

will see us stand up for what is right...with a loud and unequivocal voice. AYE!

Silent3

(15,221 posts)
12. I'm nearly certain that the IMMEDIATE response to such a vote...
Tue Oct 15, 2019, 10:44 PM
Oct 2019

...would be an instantaneous pivot from calling the impeachment illegitimate because the vote hadn't been held, to calling it illegitimate because only Democrats had voted for it, "proving" that the impeachment was "a partisan witch hunt".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»does anybody know of any ...