Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTranscript-Gate 5.0 The full Ukrainian transcript will nail down quid pro quo!!!
Transcript-Gate:The Deliberate Attempt by the Trump White House to Misrepresent and Hide the Full Transcript of Trumps Ukrainian Call
Summary: The WH released a highly redacted summary of the Ukrainian call, likely cutting out more explicit references to quid pro quo.
So far, this file is two sections of information and one for links to original documents.
Contents:
I. Longer, more accurate, word-for-word transcript exists.
II. The full transcript has eight (8) references to Biden.
III. Original materials.
(If you find relevant material on his issue, please add it to this thread and I will incorporate in the next version. This file can become a decent recourse for us on this issue.)
******************************************************************************
I. A longer, more accurate, word-for-word transcript exists
Dan Bongino on Fox and Friends (10.07.19) claimed the summary of the transcript that the WH released was the entire conversation. He said it is only 11 minutes (of a 30 min. call) because of the time it took the translators to relay the messages. But translators at this level work real-time with the speaker as with speeches the United Nations.
Trump himself continually claimed (as DU member California Republic witnessed) the SUMMARY transcript is word-for-word as at his rally in Minneapolis 10.10,19.
In a 7:30 a.m. tweet on October 9, Trump lied, saying the transcript covered the entire call:
The so-called Whistleblower, before knowing I was going to release
the exact Transcript, stated that my call with the Ukrainian President
was crazy, frightening, and completely lacking in substance related
to national security. This is a very big Lie. Read the Transcript!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212561976
At rallies in Minneapolis and Lake Charles, Louisiana (October10 &11), Trump continually characterized the document he released as a full transcript despite the fact that it is clearly labeled, in all caps, MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION.
Such official characterizations are important because it makes the case behind a subpoena stronger since (much as the release of the MEMORANDUM effectively nullifies all claims of privilege) such a characterization leaves that, itself, open to investigation.
But the whistle-blower claimed a fuller, word-for-word transcript exists. On page 3 of the report. he or she writes:
"In the days following the phone call, I learned from multiple U.S. officials
that senior White House officials had intervened to 'lock down' all records
of the phone call, especially the official word-for-word transcript of the
call that was producedas is customaryby the White House
Situation Room." (Bottom, p. 3):
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/26/us/politics/whistle-blower-complaint.html
On Morning Joe Oct. 3rd. Congressman Subramanian Raja Krishnamoorthi (D. Illinois) made the same case clearly, even telling how the actual transcription occurred with voice-recognition software and editing.
On Oct. 9th, CNN confirmed the congressmans points about the creation of the full transcript:
. . . a State Department interpreter fluent in Ukrainian was providing
real-time translation. And a duty officer from the Situation Room took
notes that would later be paired with a log of the call using voice
recognition software to put together a rough transcript.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/08/politics/donald-trump-ukraine-call-details-aftermath/index.html
Congressman Agnus King (I. Maine) has also noted its existence:
Independent Senator Angus King has claimed that some 20 minutes
of the phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President
Volodymyr Zelensky are missing from the White House memo detailing
the conversation.
King told CNN host Anderson Cooper Tuesday that he and his staff had
reconstructed the call using the memo, determining that more than two
thirds of the call time was unaccounted for.
The full transcript of the now-infamous call between the two leaders has
not been released. Though the document makes clear that the read out has
been edited, it is not clear exactly how much has been cut, and what t
hose sections may contain.
https://www.newsweek.com/senator-king-suggests-least-20-minutes-are-missing-trump-ukraine-call-transcript-1462622
Quoting the above CNN story, Chris Hayes on All In with Chris Hayes spent the initial minutes of A block on the issue of a word-for-word transcript, emphasizing its importance. He claimed that by showing the summary Trump has waved executive privilege making it easier to get with a subpoena. One of Hayess guests reenforced that view, however another said the summary may be essentially the entire except for what the ellipses, but was uncertain.
Trumps call to Ukraine was so troubling, they secreted the full transcript on a highly classified server as CNN reported 10.9.19:
The scramble and fallout from the call, described by six people familiar
with it, parallels and expands upon details described in the whistleblower
complaint. The anxiety and internal concern reflect a phone conversation
that deeply troubled national security professionals. . . .
At least one National Security Council official alerted the White House's
national security lawyers about the concerns, three sources familiar with
the matter said, a detail that had not been previously disclosed. Those
same lawyers would later order the transcript of the call moved to a highly
classified server typically reserved for code-word classified material.
. . .
The order to move the transcript came from the White House's national
security lawyers to prevent more people from seeing it, according to people
familiar with the situation. It also came after recognition the document
would need to be preserved for legal reasons.
Ned Price however believes the unaccounted for time was due to the translaters:
"Ned Price
✔@nedprice
This account confirms that Trump and Zelensky spoke through interpreters. That explains why the reconstructed transcript doesn't reflect 30 minutes of dialogue. There's more than enough betrayal captured in the transcript and little need to speculate about what might be omitted."
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212563612
******************************************************************************
II. The full transcript has eight (8) references to Biden
ABC News claims Trump mentioned Biden eight(8) times, urging Ukraine to help with investigation as did The Wall Street Journal:
The newly released transcript of President Donald Trump's phone call
with Ukraines President Volodymyr Zelenskiy reveals that Trump repeatedly
urged him eight times -- to work with his personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani,
to help with investigations, including into former Vice President Joe Biden
and Bidens son.
The Wall Street Journalfirst reported on Saturday (9.28) that Trump urged Zelenskiy
to work with Giuliani about eight times during the July 25 call. (All ABC):
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/times-trump-urged-ukraines-leader-investigate-biden/story?id=65850945
https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-defends-conversation-with-ukraine-leader-11568993176 (I couldnt get passed the pay-wall)
Yet Trump on the SUMMARY transcript only mentions Biden one (1) time.
A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your
v ery good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people
involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the_
mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to
call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General.
Rudy very much knows what's happening and he is a very
capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great. . . .
(my ellision) The other thing. There's a lot of talk about Biden's son,
that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find
out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General
would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the
prosecution so if you can look into it ... It sounds horrible to me.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-transcript-read-ukraine-president-phone-call-transcript-pdf-released-today-joe-biden-crowdstrike-2019-09-25/
Where are the seven or so other times? Are they more explicit about quid pro quo? If Trump and his people made the summary we can count on the fact that the other references are more damning to The President. If we got only 11 mins. of a 30 min. call and that was terrible for Trump, imagine what is in the full 30 min. call!
They even rushed out the summary so no one would think to ask for (or subpoena) the full, word-for-word transcript of the entire 30 min. conversation.
But now that theyve given us a SUMMARY the subpoena should have great appeal to a judge: after all they represented the summary as indicative of the entire. The Congress has a right to see if this is so.
*******************************************************************
III. Original materials
Full text of whistle-blower complaint can be found at NY Times, Politico, and Fox:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/26/us/politics/whistle-blower-complaint.html
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/09/26/read-the-trump-ukraine-whistleblower-complaint-002239
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/whistleblower-complaint-on-trump-ukraine-call-read-the-document
CBS has the full SUMMARY transcript:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-transcript-read-ukraine-president-phone-call-transcript-pdf-released-today-joe-biden-crowdstrike-2019-09-25/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 781 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Transcript-Gate 5.0 The full Ukrainian transcript will nail down quid pro quo!!! (Original Post)
skip fox
Oct 2019
OP
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)1. It's already nailed down.
Im sure the deleted transcript sections are even worse.
But there is already evidence of a quid pro quo.
jpak
(41,759 posts)2. I smell an 18 minute gap in that transcripts future
Last edited Mon Oct 14, 2019, 12:42 PM - Edit history (1)
It will never be released and possibly "bleached" from the classified server.
Yup
skip fox
(19,359 posts)3. Of course you're right,
but some of these jerks (Republican senators/spokesmen/right-wing commentators) still deny the obvious quid pro quo which exists in the released memorandum. If a more detailed transcript exists, as it probably does, and it shows quid pro quo more clearly and/or insistently, as is highly likely, then these jokers won't be able to sway as many of the public as they already have.