General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Fact That Romney Is NOT At Least 15 Points Down In The Polls Is ----
a tribute to the stupidity of too many Americans. He and the GOP have nothing to offer the country except misery, division, hatred and austerity.
RagAss
(13,832 posts)unblock
(52,285 posts)he might TALK about austerity, and he might give a big middle finger to those in need, but don't think for a minute that it's austerity he's pushing.
republicans are masters of heavily funding the federal government through taxes on the poor and middle class and debt on future generations, then absconding with the loot via tax cuts and lax enforcement for the rich and big businesses; preferential, overpriced, no-bid government contracts; and wholesale giveaways of government properties.
that's not austerity. it's looting and pillaging.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Dems should educate voters what "austerity" means, and to be wary of wealthy Republicans when they use the word. And they will use it... but never regarding themselves.
unblock
(52,285 posts)"austerity" involves minimal spending in order to shore up finances. there's no such thing as "austerity" for ANYONE if it doesn't shore up finances.
as long as they continue to siphon funds out of the treasury, then whoever they're short-changing isn't getting "austerity", they're getting screwed.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Cutting most of the other programs though which are already running deficits and have no trust fund to speak of, that would be austerity in the true sense of the word.
unblock
(52,285 posts)reducing the debt by 1% or whatever by ending wic and then adding 8% to the debt by jacking up military expenditures is NOT austerity.
reducing the debt by 1% and actually freezing everything else, actually paying down the debt, that would be austerity. it would still but stupid and unfair and unwise and immoral, but at least the term "austerity" would be appropriate then.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)is because of the economy. If Obama can win this election he will be one of the first presidents to win in a bad economy. His favorable stats are looking good and the economy is not doing as bad as it was. As much as we would love to crush Romney and win by a landslide, I think it will be closer than most of us would want it to be. But I do believe Obama has a good chance. Of course we also have Citizens United to contend with. This is unprecedented. We will not know the full extent of the how it will affect the election until election night. We have to do what we did in 2008 and get the grassroots organization going again. Small donations from lots of people and lots of ground work getting the vote out.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)The economy was a lot worse just 3 years ago, and many people have woken up and realized that the GOP was to blame for most of that mess. Although that won't be enough if we don't stop fighting voter suppression.
BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Women are far more likely to vote for Obama.
(I'm a white man and this post gives me no pleasure)
LittlestStar
(224 posts)you wouldnt feel so bad. She has 3 very liberal daughters (no sons) and still thinks the R ticket is the way to go, because right wing radio has her turned into such a paranoid fruitcake that she votes out of completely illegitimate fear. It is really the worst, she is not even senile yet. Or perhaps she is.
abolugi
(417 posts)to empty chairs yet, is she?
savalez
(3,517 posts)I have a family member like that. It's annoying as can be. I minimize my contact with that person and talking politics is a no no (although they can't help themselves). The Right Wing lie machine is relentless.
Welcome to DU!
reformist2
(9,841 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)That and terribly flawed polling methods as well.
CoffeeCat
(24,411 posts)Romney will be hoping for the days when he wasn't down by 10+ points.
Obama will kick his ass.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)I mean some of them are but most are just ignorant of the scope of the situation and the depravity of the Republican side.
Imagine if you were not paying attention and then you decided to tune in to the conventions and you were watching from the window of FOX news because it was the only news window of which you were aware. Would you be able to see through their crap? Some of them will. It may take the "debates" but many of them will...
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Those poor saps think that they're watching "news."
jimlup
(7,968 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)No sense putting sugar on a stone cold fact.
discopants
(535 posts)Obama has a bump from the GOP convention.
[IMG][/IMG]