Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 06:47 PM Oct 2019

NBC Weekend News: Second WB emerges. So, first one had

only 2nd hand information, but this latest one evidently has 1st hand. That's more reassuring. But hasn't dump committed enuff impeachable offenses even b4 the Ukraine issue to qualify?

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NBC Weekend News: Second WB emerges. So, first one had (Original Post) sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 OP
I wonder how many more will come forward? CountAllVotes Oct 2019 #1
Sure he has, but ask any prosecutor you may run into just how difficult it often is... TreasonousBastard Oct 2019 #2
Yes, the WB's evidence presenting itself at this point in time is sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #3
Er, didn't the IG say the the first WB had first-hand info? stopbush Oct 2019 #4
Yes mercuryblues Oct 2019 #9
I have become discombobulated. eom sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #12
YOu have? LOL mercuryblues Oct 2019 #22
That right chere be the reason. sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #23
We need more! RainCaster Oct 2019 #5
There could be 100 such to emerge, guillaumeb Oct 2019 #6
Deep State!!!1!11!!!!1!1!!! SlogginThroughIt Oct 2019 #8
Linda Tripp only had second hand information on Bill Clinton blueinredohio Oct 2019 #7
Exactly. She wasn't hiding under the desk, watching. pnwmom Oct 2019 #11
The first WB had BOTH first hand and second hand information, but the new WB pnwmom Oct 2019 #10
We waiting on the kibosh to end all kiboshes. eom sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #14
There's plenty already to impeach, but not nearly enough to convict. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #13
I just hope it's gonna be played out successfully. sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #15
Here's 'him': sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #16
Yeah, he and Republicans are trying hard to control the narrative and muddy the water. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #17
You've been advocating all along that the Dems need to control the narrative. I'm with you on that sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #18
And there can be honest debate about whether Dems are doing that well enough. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #20
What kind of 'organic' mechanism (for lack of a better) affects and sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #21
It's a balancing act for sure to get it right. sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #19

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
2. Sure he has, but ask any prosecutor you may run into just how difficult it often is...
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 06:51 PM
Oct 2019

to put together a winning case.

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
3. Yes, the WB's evidence presenting itself at this point in time is
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 07:01 PM
Oct 2019

frosting on the cupcake. Are we aiming for an airtight case, or just as close as we can come in our offense.

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
9. Yes
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 08:06 PM
Oct 2019

the 1st Wb had 1st hand knowledge on some stuff. 2nd hand knowledge on other stuff.

This Wb has 1st hand knowledge. On what, I don't know.

mercuryblues

(14,532 posts)
22. YOu have? LOL
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 07:40 AM
Oct 2019

There's rumor of another WB out there. this one from the IRS claiming trump tried to interfere with his taxes being audited.

RainCaster

(10,882 posts)
5. We need more!
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 07:12 PM
Oct 2019

How many government employees have seen crooked things that pissed them off, or made their skin crawl? Come out of the woodwork please!

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
6. There could be 100 such to emerge,
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 07:33 PM
Oct 2019

and the die hard Trump supporters would not care. That is the brilliant simplicity of the "fake news" meme, which evolved from the "liberal media" meme.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
10. The first WB had BOTH first hand and second hand information, but the new WB
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 08:07 PM
Oct 2019

supposedly was closer to the action and has even more first hand info.

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
15. I just hope it's gonna be played out successfully.
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 09:30 PM
Oct 2019

The dirty side are putting it out there that the longer the process takes, the better off dump'll fare. Snakey evil.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
17. Yeah, he and Republicans are trying hard to control the narrative and muddy the water.
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 09:59 PM
Oct 2019

Last edited Sun Oct 6, 2019, 10:52 PM - Edit history (2)

If it's out in the open, it can't be a crime.

It's not political; it's about fighting corruption.

Biden's the corrupt one, and Ukraine colluded with the Clinton campaign--it wasn't Russia colluding with my campaign.

There's nothing wrong with having private conversations with foreign leaders. (Except for that pesky Presidential Records Act.)

So-and-so told me to do it.

It was just a joke.

And so on.

As silly and just plain false as those arguments are, Democrats do need to be vigilant about controlling the narrative by pointing out how wrong the arguments are *and* - I would argue - by pointing out what tactic is being employed. Because as obvious as it is to some of us, I guarantee many people aren't going to recognize that Trump and his minions are attempting to convince people that their transparency (never mind that it was forced by the whistleblower) equates to innocence. 'I'm not hiding this, so it can't be wrong.' When he says on live TV that China should investigate Biden, Dem leadership should hold a press conference and spell out exactly what he's doing, which is two things. First and foremost, he's committing an impeachable offense. Secondly, he's trying to fool the public into believing that crimes committed openly can't possibly be crimes. Dear American people, don't be fooled--transparent illegality is still illegality. And remind the American people that there is still much that *is* being hidden, including transcripts of calls that have no business being stored on a server meant for highly classified records. And remind the American people that making threats to whistleblowers is witness intimidation and a crime. Never underestimate the ignorance of the American people; they need constant reminders.

And Democrats also need to avoid taking too long, as the public could get bored. At the same time, to have any chance at flipping any Republicans (let alone flipping enough to get a conviction), Schiff and Co. have to gather a mountain of damning evidence. Since there's little chance they'll get the documents or the testimony they've requested -- subpoenas and judge's orders mean nothing to this administration -- Schiff and Co. are reliant upon more and more whistleblowers coming forward. Also, they need public support for impeachment and removal to continue to rise, which is where controlling the narrative comes into play.

I suspect even audio of Trump engaged in clear quid pro quo with Putin (such as doing Lord Vladimir's bidding in exchange for him not releasing tapes of Trump engaged in heinous acts) would not be enough to flip 20 Republican Senators. Those assholes are so corrupt, so bent on bringing about fascism and so ethically bankrupt that I'm not sure anything would sway them to remove Trump from office. I don't give a shit what Biden says, there are most certainly not "a lot of really good Republicans." Maybe, just maybe, more whistleblowers coming forward and public support for conviction continuing to rise will convince McConnell and Co. to persuade Trump to resign, but we can't count on that. This is not the Republican Party of 1974 (not that those Republicans were all that great).

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
18. You've been advocating all along that the Dems need to control the narrative. I'm with you on that
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 01:34 AM
Oct 2019
1,000%. Wherz their PR dept. specialists. Take all the lying crap and dish it right back from whence it came.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
20. And there can be honest debate about whether Dems are doing that well enough.
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 01:53 AM
Oct 2019

For instance, I think Pelosi and Schiff should have immediately pounced when Trump publicly called for China to investigate Biden, but I can accept that someone might feel differently.

But something that is definitely not happening that I've been saying for a long time should be happening is Dems explaining (in very simple terms) the tactic that Republicans are employing in order to discombobulate the masses. Let's face it, most people need help understanding not just the what but also the *why* behind various lies and misleading statements. If prominent Dems, those with a platform, continually point out these tactics, eventually it'll register in the public consciousness. But it requires a dogged persistence. Repeat, repeat, repeat. That's how Republicans made "liberal media" a household term, and that has had devastating effects on the public consciousness and the media itself.

As I wrote yesterday, here are some easy-to-understand ways in which Dems could address various tactics:

Trump wants you to believe that crimes committed out in the open can't possibly be crimes. He's wrong. Crimes out in the open are still crimes. He is committing impeachable offenses and hoping you'll fall for his tactic. Don't.

Republicans have for many decades employed the strategy of accusing Democrats of the very thing they are doing, so as to muddy the water and inspire false equivalencies (something the media loves to promote). The American people need to recognize this tactic for what it is and not fall for it.

Republicans are employing the Gish gallop, which is defined as "a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments." In other words, they're trying to drown their opponents in so much bullshit that one doesn't even know where to begin in responding. Well, we're not going to play that game. When they are ready to join the rest of us in the land of fact-based reality, then and only then can we have an honest discussion. In the meantime, don't fall for their tactic.

These tactics will continue to work unless Democrats repeatedly shine a light on the tactics themselves.

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
21. What kind of 'organic' mechanism (for lack of a better) affects and
Mon Oct 7, 2019, 04:05 AM
Oct 2019

compels them to have such a knack for spewing such bull scheisse. It may be that they gave place to The Evil One and are doing its [his] bidding.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NBC Weekend News: Second ...