Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 10:44 AM Oct 2019

Judge orders White House to preserve records of Trump's calls with foreign leaders

https://www.axios.com/judge-orders-white-house-preserve-records-68cee3dc-0a80-4eb8-ba29-2d702232e879.html?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=organic

U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ordered the White House on Thursday to preserve records of President Trump’s communications with foreign leaders, including those with Ukraine's president that have spurred an impeachment inquiry in the House, according to Politico.

Why it matters: Jackson's order seems to address concerns outlined in a whistleblower complaint that the White House has used procedures reserved for highly sensitive information to to limit access to potentially damaging conversations between Trump and foreign leaders. CNN has reported that officials took steps to restrict access to Trump's calls with Vladimir Putin, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Details: Jackson ordered the White House to not destroy records of Trump's "meetings, phone calls, and other communications with foreign leaders," and to preserve "all records of efforts by White House or other executive branch officials to return, ‘claw back,’ ’lock down’ or recall White House records” about dealings with foreign officials, per Politico.

The order is the result of a lawsuit filed in May by watchdog groups and 2 history-focused organizations that alleged that the Trump administration is violating the Presidential Records Act.

Though the suit predates Trump's phone call with Zelensky, lawyers asked Jackson on Oct. 1 to issue a temporary restraining order, citing reports that records of Trump’s actions were being locked down.

Jackson did not grant the restraining order, but she did file the request for 6 categories of records to be preserved.

</snip>


Good idea!
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge orders White House to preserve records of Trump's calls with foreign leaders (Original Post) Dennis Donovan Oct 2019 OP
This took long enough. Lets see if they comply. onetexan Oct 2019 #1
This probably got the shredders fired up and running. spanone Oct 2019 #2
Why did she NOT grant restraining order? bluestarone Oct 2019 #3
Good question. triron Oct 2019 #6
Good thing the whistleblowers have their texts mucifer Oct 2019 #4
This regime doesn't give a shit Golden Raisin Oct 2019 #5
The only hope we have are whistleblowers. Garrett78 Oct 2019 #10
Oh, I'm sure they will preserve the records.....unredacted......unaltered.........ya, right. Firestorm49 Oct 2019 #7
I believe Rachel talked about this Friday night. triron Oct 2019 #8
I thought you weren't supposed to destroy documents like that to begin with... W_HAMILTON Oct 2019 #9
Still will that be enough? triron Oct 2019 #12
It's al digital greymattermom Oct 2019 #11

onetexan

(13,041 posts)
1. This took long enough. Lets see if they comply.
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 10:47 AM
Oct 2019

I wouldnt be surprised if they've replaced the original server with a newly built one.

Golden Raisin

(4,609 posts)
5. This regime doesn't give a shit
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 11:11 AM
Oct 2019

about norms, laws, subpoenas, courts --- any of it. The delete keys and shredders have probably been whirring for weeks, aided and abetted by our supposed "Justice" Department, under rogue and Trump-lackey Barr.

Garrett78

(10,721 posts)
10. The only hope we have are whistleblowers.
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 11:38 AM
Oct 2019

This administration has repeatedly broken the law, ignored subpoenas and disobeyed judge's orders without consequences.

W_HAMILTON

(7,867 posts)
9. I thought you weren't supposed to destroy documents like that to begin with...
Sun Oct 6, 2019, 11:36 AM
Oct 2019

...specifically because of FOIA requests and stuff like that.

It's a sad statement that a judge has to order this corrupt administration to follow the law.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge orders White House ...