General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNancy Pelosi: An Extremely Stable Genius
Before we begin to grapple with the gravity of the impeachment inquiry that is now upon us, can we acknowledge yet again the extreme weirdness of our times? If, through the distorting mists of time, the heroes and anti-heroes of the Watergate saga seem positively Shakespearean in their statureNixon raging on the heath, his cunning satraps devising their poisoned betrayalswhat to make of todays dramatis personae of Kiev and Washington, Presidents Zelensky and Trump, one a comic actor turned fledgling statesman, the other a real-estate grifter turned . . . political grifter? Scholars of the Volodymyr Zelensky filmography will recall his appearances in Love in the Big City 2 and Rzhevsky Versus Napoleon. And they will credit his work in the television show Servant of the People, in which he played the President of Ukraine, a role that set him on the path to being the actual President of Ukraine. Zelensky is an expressive comic artist. And so it is not hard to imagine his mask of terrorized bewilderment as he held a telephone to his ear in July and listened to the ex-star of The Apprentice deliver an implicit threat to deprive his country of military aid and diplomatic standing if he failed to interfere in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election on Trumps behalf. This is our reality.
Into this reality has stepped, if belatedly, Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of California, Speaker of the House.
From the start, Pelosi has confronted Trump with a wry fearlessness. When, in a moment of rare self-aggrandizement, Trump referred to himself as an extremely stable genius, she replied, When the extremely stable genius starts acting more Presidential, Ill be happy to work with him on infrastructure, trade, and other issues. In an Oval Office confrontation last year, she brooked no disrespect from Trump and asked that he please not underestimate the strength that I bring to this meeting as the leader of the House Democrats. When, on another occasion, Trump referred to Pelosi as a mess, the Speaker thoughtfully suggested that the President might benefit from an intervention for the good of the country.
For months, however, Pelosi avoided the ultimate intervention. She frustrated many members of the Democratic caucus who believedfor myriad reasons, some contained in the Mueller Report, some notthat they should pursue an impeachment inquiry against the President. Pelosi was reluctant, worried that there was not enough evidence to prevent a backfire scenario, in which Trump would emerge from impeachment still safely in office, emboldened, unchallenged by his own party, a martyr with an enhanced prospect at reëlection.
Remember this, Pelosi told me, in an interview on Thursday afternoon, as she recalled the Watergate era. I saw, as a young person, that the Republicans didnt come around until the tapes. It wasnt like they were saying, This behavior is not acceptable to us. The tapes were dispositive of the issue. There was no vote to impeach, because it was so clear that he had to go. But even Nixon knew of his responsibility to the country. Im not sure this person does.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/the-political-scene/nancy-pelosi-an-extremely-stable-genius
dweller
(23,651 posts)recommended reading..
👍🏻
✌🏼
onetexan
(13,056 posts)We may possibly have a President Pelosi if pence gets indicted too.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)own admission to Wolff, that Pelosi already had seen through the new Administration - and that they were no match for Pelosi.