Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,993 posts)
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 01:02 PM Aug 2019

Graham open to putting Obama under oath in probe into Russia investigation origins

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham says he is open to putting Barack Obama under oath as he probes potential White House involvement in opening an investigation into unproven ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia.

Graham says one of the biggest remaining mysteries in the Trump-Russia saga that needs to be unraveled is who told President Obama about the counterintelligence investigation into then-candidate Donald Trump. The South Carolina Republican wants answers from the former president.

As part of his probe, Graham is prepared to call former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, former FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director John Brennan, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to testify.

Graham joined Sean Hannity on Fox News on Wednesday night to say he was determined to get to the bottom of the launching of the Trump-Russia investigation, and that the “bottom line” for him was figuring out what Obama knew, when he knew it, and whom he learned it from.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/graham-open-to-putting-obama-under-oath-in-probe-into-russia-investigation-origins/ar-AAGvoLv?li=BBnb7Kz

Please proceed Lindsey. You might asked your fellow South Carolinian Trey Gowdy how the gotcha game worked out for him.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Graham open to putting Obama under oath in probe into Russia investigation origins (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2019 OP
He's such an ass, trying so hard to stay relevant. Hope his end is near along with the rest of them monmouth4 Aug 2019 #1
Oh Linthey, you are such a pig! Meadowoak Aug 2019 #20
Bring it, bitches. maxsolomon Aug 2019 #2
Pres O has nothing to hide . . . Iliyah Aug 2019 #3
Obama Should Publicly Agree to This--Just to Shut Lindsey the Eff Up. The_Counsel Aug 2019 #4
Right attitude, wrong idea Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #13
I'm Guessing Lindsey Doesn't Really Want Obama Under Oath for a Couple of Reasons. The_Counsel Aug 2019 #16
Bring it on! Turin_C3PO Aug 2019 #5
so what if Obama refused and said it was privileged because just because? librechik Aug 2019 #6
I have to disagree ... I think Obama would tell Lindsey to fuck off, in so many words ... mr_lebowski Aug 2019 #14
Can Obama Invoke Executive Priviledge If He's No Longer the Executive...? The_Counsel Aug 2019 #15
Dunno but I doubt Lindsey wants to open that can of worms and expose Trump later (nt) mr_lebowski Aug 2019 #21
Please proceed, asshole. GoCubsGo Aug 2019 #7
They might agree as long safeinOhio Aug 2019 #8
Take your best shot treason weasel. denbot Aug 2019 #9
Criminalizing the opposition to protect the criminal Putin approves OAITW r.2.0 Aug 2019 #10
You would be so very sorry Lindsey. mahina Aug 2019 #11
This is nonsense Proud Liberal Dem Aug 2019 #12
Please proceed, Senator Graham jmowreader Aug 2019 #17
It could create quite the protest. Obama is a national treasure. Tech Aug 2019 #18
Why bother when he knows PBO will be truthful, but not helpful to his cause of protecting Trump? Ilsa Aug 2019 #19
yea, well FUCK lindsey graham. spanone Aug 2019 #22

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
13. Right attitude, wrong idea
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 01:37 PM
Aug 2019

It would be unprecedented (wouldn't it?) to call a former President of the United States to testify in Congress?

The_Counsel

(1,660 posts)
16. I'm Guessing Lindsey Doesn't Really Want Obama Under Oath for a Couple of Reasons.
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 02:22 PM
Aug 2019

1. Graham should know there isn't anything there, so the only reason he'd put Obama under oath would be to embarrass him and energize the base with a "gotcha" quote or two.

2. Breaking this precedent also leaves one Mr. Trump open for questioning once he leaves office--assuming he doesn't immediately leave the country the day his successor is sworn in.

librechik

(30,674 posts)
6. so what if Obama refused and said it was privileged because just because?
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 01:12 PM
Aug 2019

and made them fight for his testimony like GOP does to us?

It would not happen of course, because Obama is not a dick. It would amuse me, though.

Also, Obama would bury Trump once that true story is forced out of him.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
14. I have to disagree ... I think Obama would tell Lindsey to fuck off, in so many words ...
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 01:40 PM
Aug 2019

For a whole host of good reasons.

#1 is he knows Lindsey ain't gonna DO ... shit about it.
#2 is that if Lindsey DOES do shit, and somehow wins and forces Obama onto the stand? That means a precedent is set, which means as soon as Trump is out of office, Congress can force TRUMP onto the stand to account for all his bullshit.

Not only that, but he knows Obama will lay them to waste when DOES get on the stand. So, back to #1 ... Lindsey ain't gonna do shit if Obama declines.

Obama absolutely should decline and state executive privilege IMHO.

The_Counsel

(1,660 posts)
15. Can Obama Invoke Executive Priviledge If He's No Longer the Executive...?
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 02:16 PM
Aug 2019

...or can anything said/done while he was President be protected by EP?

GoCubsGo

(32,084 posts)
7. Please proceed, asshole.
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 01:15 PM
Aug 2019

The sooner, the better. All of them. Obama, Clapper, Comey, McCabe, Brennan, the head of every US intelligence agency, including those in the DoD... Do it on national TV. Go for it!

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,412 posts)
12. This is nonsense
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 01:36 PM
Aug 2019

There was plenty of rationale for opening the Trump-Russia Investigation. Republicans once again are being obsessive and chasing their tails on insignificant details (Steele Dossier) that actually didn't have anything to do with anything.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
17. Please proceed, Senator Graham
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 02:29 PM
Aug 2019

Lindsay has a HUGE problem: he does NOT want emerging in an open Senate inquisition that the reason the NSA got wind of the Trump Tower server was that it was talking to a Russian bank server in the middle of a presidential campaign.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
19. Why bother when he knows PBO will be truthful, but not helpful to his cause of protecting Trump?
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 02:52 PM
Aug 2019

How hard is it to figure it out: when you are making periodic contact with russian oligarchs who are under surveillance, your relationship is exposed to Intel. If somethings sounds illegal or a matter of national security, Intel gets a FISA warrant to listen to you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Graham open to putting Ob...