General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJim Mattis Couldn't Take It Anymore
On December 19 of last year, Admiral Michael Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, met James Mattis for lunch at the Pentagon. Mattis was a day away from resigning as Donald Trumps secretary of defense, but he tends to keep his own counsel, and he did not suggest to Mullen, his friend and former commander, that he was thinking of leaving.
But Mullen did think Mattis appeared unusually afflicted that day. Mattis often seemed burdened in his role. His aides and friends say he found the president to be of limited cognitive ability, and of generally dubious character. Now Mattis was becoming more and more isolated in the administration, especially since the defenestration of his closest Cabinet ally, the former secretary of state Rex Tillerson, several months earlier. Mattis and Tillerson had together smothered some of Trumps more extreme and imprudent ideas. But now Mattis was operating without cover. Trump was turning on him publicly; two months earlier, he had speculated that Mattis might be a Democrat and said, in reference to NATO, I think I know more about it than he does. (Mattis, as a Marine general, once served as the supreme allied commander in charge of NATO transformation.)
Mullen told me recently that service in this administration comes with a unique set of hazards, and that Mattis was not unaware of these hazards. I think back to his Hold the line talk, the one that was captured on video, Mullen said, referring to an impromptu 2017 encounter between Mattis and U.S. troops stationed in Jordan that became a YouTube sensation. In the video, Mattis tells the soldiers, Our country right now, its got problems we dont have in the military. You just hold the line until our country gets back to understanding and respecting each other and showing it. Mullen said: He obviously found himself in a challenging environment.
Mullens concern for Mattis was shared by many other generals and admirals, active duty and retired, who worried that sustained exposure to Trump would destroy their friend, who is perhaps the most revered living marine. Mattis had maintained his dignity in perilous moments, even as his fellow Cabinet officials were relinquishing theirs. At a ritualized praise session at the White House in June 2017, as the vice president and other Cabinet members abased themselves before the president, Mattis would offer only this generic but, given the circumstances, dissident thought: Its an honor to represent the men and women of the Department of Defense. We are grateful for the sacrifices our people are making in order to strengthen our military, so our diplomats always negotiate from a position of strength.
By last December, Mattis was facing the most urgent crisis of his nearly two years in the Cabinet. Trump had just announced, contrary to his administrations stated policy, that he would withdraw all American troops from Syria, where they were fighting the Islamic State. This sudden (and ultimately reversed) policy shift posed a dire challenge to Mattiss beliefs. He had spent much of his career as a fighter in the Middle East. He had battled Islamist extremists and understood the danger they represented. He believed that a retreat from Syria would threaten the security of American troops elsewhere in the region, and would especially threaten Americas allies in the anti-ISIS coalition. These allies would, in Mattiss view, feel justifiably betrayed by Trumps decision.
-snip-
The next day, he met Trump in the Oval Office. Mattis made his case for keeping troops in Syria. Trump rejected his arguments. Thirty minutes into the conversation, Mattis told the president, Youre going to have to get the next secretary of defense to lose to ISIS. Im not going to do it. He handed Trump his resignation letter, a letter that would soon become one of the most famous documents of the Trump presidency thus far.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-man-who-couldnt-take-it-anymore/ar-AAGv20j?li=BBnb7Kz
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)I think you mean "he's a stupid asshole."
I could have told Mattis it was a fool's errand much earlier.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,620 posts)I felt as though he was the last grown-up in that misbegotten administration and that without him, things would rapidly disintegrate, which they did.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,620 posts)He wasn't afraid to tell tRump what he (Mattis) thought about whatever the topic was.
I also think it was amazing that tRump wanted him on the team. Perhaps Mattis was brought in because of a suggestion from someone else; I don't know. But that he was even there at all was amazing to me.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)BootinUp
(47,151 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)They are just a few thousand fighters short of when Trump took office and growing. What happened to the 30 day secret plan?
And where is the media on this?
awesomerwb1
(4,268 posts)Be a hero Mattis.
(not holding my breath).
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)He doesn't want them questioning leadership, and in doing so, make critical errors, whether legal or tactical. I understand this. But somehow, the military needs to know what has gone on in the WH. They also need to know that the military leaders are not conflicted about their duty to the Constitution.