General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRep. Sean Duffy plans to save his newborn's life using pre-existing conditions protections...
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/08/rep-sean-duffy-plans-to-save-his-newborns-life-with-pre-existing-conditions-protections-he-tried-to-kill/
Wisconsin Congressman Sean Duffy (R) announced this week that he is stepping down from his House seat to care for his ninth child who is expected to be born with a heart condition.
Think Progress noted on Tuesday that Duffy and his wife, Rachel Campos-Duffy, plan to take advantage of the pre-existing conditions protections provided by President Barack Obamas health care reform law.
Duffys child is expected to need surgery soon after birth.
As a congressman, Duffy repeatedly voted to kill the same protections that may now save his childs life.
During his eight years in Congress, Duffy repeatedly voted to destroy Obamacare and undermine the pre-existing condition protections. He enthusiastically voted for Trumpcare in 2017, which would have made insurance coverage significantly less affordable for those with pre-existing conditions, and just this May he voted against the Protecting Americans with Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019.
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)Hypocrisy is not just a word, it's a way of life! Vote Republican! Bedbugs for Trump 2020!
JI7
(89,252 posts)Coventina
(27,121 posts)this child's future suffering.
Fuck them indeed.
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)Ohiogal
(32,006 posts)so its okay.
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)kimbutgar
(21,163 posts)Lets just say some white supremist would look down on them.
TryLogic
(1,723 posts)Sorry. Couldn't resist.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)He wasn't able to get rid of those provisions, so why not?
Fucking Hypocrite!
Crafty Girl
(28 posts)I worked in group insurance for some years. A child whose parents are covered when he/she is born is automatically covered under the parents insurance. It always has been that way. If this child had been born before Obamacare he/she would still have been covered.
Lochloosa
(16,066 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)I did find this little nugget...
https://www.thebalance.com/obamacare-pre-existing-conditions-3306072
Of those with pre-existing conditions who sought private insurance, 47 percent didn't get it. They were either denied coverage, charged a higher premium, or had their condition excluded because of it.
A child would be covered when born auto coverage, but with a pre-existing condition????
Crafty Girl
(28 posts)Yes, the child would have been covered.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)A one year old could end up uninsurable.
tblue37
(65,408 posts)mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)Newborn Denied Health Insurance Coverage Days After Life-Saving Heart Surgery
By
lauren cox and lara salahi
March 27, 2010
Houston Tracy, a 12-day-old boy, has already survived a rare birth defect, a feeding tube and open heart surgery. Now his family is waiting to see how the battle with an insurance company will fare.
Last week, Houston's parents found out that the term "pre-existing condition" can apply the moment someone is born.
"When he came out, he made one little cry and he didn't really cry much," said Houston's father, Doug Tracy, 39, of Crowley, Texas.
Tracy cut the umbilical cord and watched the hospital staff clean his son. But before his wife Kim Tracy, 36, could touch their son doctors got worried. "We could tell there was something wrong by the way they [the doctors] were acting," Doug Tracy said.
Before Obama care they could be denied coverage. Even if they weighed too much.
'Your baby is too fat': Insurer denies baby Alex Lange coverage because of weight
Crafty Girl
(28 posts)FTA:
But by March 24, the Tracy family formally heard their son was denied health insurance.
"We don't have health coverage on ourselves because it's too expensive these days and because of the economy," Doug Tracy said. The couple are small business owners and would have to buy individual policies, which they have for their other children Cooper, 4, and Jewel, 11.
They were looking to purchase an individual policy for the newborn. If the parents had been covered, as the Duffys are, the child would have been covered from birth/
onenote
(42,714 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)I admired him a few days ago for stepping down to care for his child and be with his wife during the days ahead. Now, not so much.
Peregrine Took
(7,415 posts)For strict Catholics, the rhythm method can work, too.
Limited my brother's family to 4. They only wanted 3 and had one "extra."
localroger
(3,629 posts)My parents were using it when I was conceived. Then after I was born they switched to real birth control.
snort
(2,334 posts)What a nob.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Typical, hypocritical, Republican Pig.
tblue37
(65,408 posts)procon
(15,805 posts)he voted to kill off Obamacare and wipe out the preexisting clause for everyone else. What a two faced, self serving, cruel and heartless bastard.
Let him live in fear day after day, worrying about the health of his own children and get a little taste of what millions of families go through thanks to him and the Republican party.
onenote
(42,714 posts)My understanding is even before Obamacare, it was commonly the case that where parents have coverage for themselves, a newborn would be covered for the first month under that insurance. Afterwards, the parents would have a window to add the child to their policy without worrying about "pre-existing" conditions (i.e., birth defects).
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)pre-existing conditions??
https://www.thebalance.com/obamacare-pre-existing-conditions-3306072
Crafty Girl
(28 posts)Back in the day, "dependent coverage" included all dependents, and new babies didn't need to be added to the parent's coverage, because the dependent premium was the same, whether you had one dependent or ten.
iscooterliberally
(2,860 posts)This one needs to be trapped and taken the humane society to get neutered. They should probably put a notch in his ear too. I feel bad for the little one though. Especially because his parents are idiots.
miyazaki
(2,244 posts)I faintly remember his superiority complex on that old MTV show.
underpants
(182,830 posts)Welcome to it Duffy
miyazaki
(2,244 posts)And I think Puck and Duffy's future wife stuck each other too.
underpants
(182,830 posts)Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Members Health Insurance has extra Benies that most would not see. There are some lifetime things in play.
Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)any health insurance I had through my job asked no questions about pre-existing conditions and required no physical. I didn't have kids or other dependents, so I don't know about that.
When I worked in group insurance, where we usually ran into problems with pre-existing in eligibility for group policies was when an employee and spouse both had group coverage under different employers. If one spouse lost his/her job (after the initial eligibility period) and applied for dependent coverage under the spouse's employer's plan, then pre-existing conditions would be taken into consideration. Even a temporary condition, like pregnancy, was sufficient to deny coverage. (But obviously, only for the duration of the pregnancy.)
The definition of pre-existing was very specific. I am a former cancer patient, and when my husband changed jobs, my coverage always continued with no lapse, as long as I wasn't in the hospital at the time of the effective date of coverage.
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)SpankMe
(2,957 posts)I'm not sure this punk-ass congressman is even aware that he's benefiting from a policy that he voted against. He's seamlessly waltzing into treatment for his newborn as if the preexisting condition benefit has always existed, and will always exist. To him, it's just a policy that "is". It's part of the background to him and he doesn't believe that anything he does as a congressman can alter it.
If the bill he voted for has passed, and the insurance company didn't cover his baby's preexisting condition, he'd stop dead in his tracks and say, "Wait...what?"
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Just one of the perks for the re-elected welfare-hating Republicans. They want it all, but not for anyone else.
Me.
(35,454 posts)Why?
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)a while back. His behavior was so obnoxious I recall googling him and thinking "oh great, and he has 8 kids." Now there will be a 9th to brainwash into right wing political thinking.
His wife works for Fox "News".