Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Aug 10, 2019, 11:05 PM Aug 2019

After the last few days, I'm wondering where the "unfit to serve as president" bar is currently set.

The prop baby photo op?

The re-tweeted conspiracy theories about a pedophile and a former president?

I'm not talking about where Nancy Pelosi and Jerry Nadler are at in the process...I've followed it, I understand what's going on.

I'm talking about the shifting sands under the spineless and complicit Republican-led Senate.

Mitch McConnell is currently enjoying an 18 percent approval rate in Kentucky. 37 percent of the people in a Public Policy Polling Survey said they plan to vote for him in 2020, 44 percent said they'd vote for the Democrat.

And yes, I fully understand that what people say in polls and what they actually do in a voting booth can be two very different things.

But his wagon also isn't hitched to a well-loved incumbent president.

Asshole's gonna be on the golf course for the next week and a half.

What we saw today is probably an indication of what we'll see for the rest of his "vacation."

Where is the bar set? What's it going to take? Are we really going to ride this to November 2020?

Is there a snowball's chance in hell that enough members of the Senate, and McConnell himself, will say "Fuck that, I'm not going down with him?"

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After the last few days, I'm wondering where the "unfit to serve as president" bar is currently set. (Original Post) Miles Archer Aug 2019 OP
For the GOP, the bar is too damn low RainCaster Aug 2019 #1
There is NO bar. Haggis for Breakfast Aug 2019 #5
yep. triron Aug 2019 #10
The BARR is set BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #11
yep Demovictory9 Aug 2019 #15
Right cilla4progress Aug 2019 #2
It is set well below whale dung. SharonAnn Aug 2019 #3
yeh, i was setting it dweller Aug 2019 #12
Currently it appears to be set 2naSalit Aug 2019 #4
Think "Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho" for President StTimofEdenRoc Aug 2019 #6
I keep thinking of the words to the old limbo song: "How low can you go?". Arkansas Granny Aug 2019 #7
With all due respect to the founding fathers - this points to a flaw in our system jimlup Aug 2019 #8
One among many reforms Nasruddin Aug 2019 #13
The Founders had confidence that the electoral college would protect the nation. LastDemocratInSC Aug 2019 #14
In the Hamptons? soryang Aug 2019 #9
The Overton Window keeps moving. What was unthinkable 6 months ago is now normal to some people GoneOffShore Aug 2019 #16
Had to look up canetoad Aug 2019 #17
Agreed...thanks to GoneOffShore for sharing that, and thank you for the clarification... Miles Archer Aug 2019 #18
Recommended. H2O Man Aug 2019 #19

RainCaster

(10,923 posts)
1. For the GOP, the bar is too damn low
Sat Aug 10, 2019, 11:11 PM
Aug 2019

They do not expect anything of each other, except to keep taking NRA rubles.

Arkansas Granny

(31,532 posts)
7. I keep thinking of the words to the old limbo song: "How low can you go?".
Sat Aug 10, 2019, 11:30 PM
Aug 2019

Every time I think the lowest bar has been reached, damn, if they don't find an even lower setting. It seems unbelievable, but there it is.

The baby photo OP was several notches lower than I could have ever imagined, even from Trump. Standing there with a child who has been orphaned because of his hateful rhetoric, grinning like a shit eating possum, giving a cheesy thumbs up with his "I don't care do you" third lady by his side is one of the most despicable things I've seen.

I won't be surprised when we see him posing with a corpse.

jimlup

(7,968 posts)
8. With all due respect to the founding fathers - this points to a flaw in our system
Sat Aug 10, 2019, 11:47 PM
Aug 2019

In a parliamentary system a vote of no-confidence would be all that was needed. In this case I do think it would happen.

LastDemocratInSC

(3,650 posts)
14. The Founders had confidence that the electoral college would protect the nation.
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 02:10 AM
Aug 2019

That the wise men would reject such a person. But the electoral college is composed of party hacks who get their appointments for being donors and party loyalists. They failed in their duty to be a firewall against insanity,

soryang

(3,299 posts)
9. In the Hamptons?
Sat Aug 10, 2019, 11:51 PM
Aug 2019

Trump cracks jokes about Equinox scandal, kamikaze pilots at Hamptons fundraiser
By Jennifer Gould Keil and Emily Smith

August 9, 2019 | 7:33pm

Among the 500 people at the Joe Farrell event were Somers and Jonathan Farkas, Steve Mnuchin, Wilbur Ross and wife Hilary Geary Ross, Rory Tahari, Joe Piscopo, Geraldo Rivera, Rudy Giuliani, Andrew Giuliani, Phil Falcone and wife Lisa Maria, Jean Shafiroff and Neal Sroka.

Also at the event were Estee Lauder billionaire and philanthropist Ronald Lauder, financier Leon Wagner, Vornado founder Steve Roth, co-chair of the RNC, Sen. Lindsey Graham, Bob Castellani, CEO of North American Rescue, real estate mogul Richard Le Frak, financier Peter Worth, commercial real estate developer Bill Stern, Rob Godfrey, former First Lady of Florida Carole Crist, Monica Crowley, Cantor Fitzgerald’s Howard Lutnicki, Steve Witkoff, Bill Ford, Joe Thal, Andrea Catsimatidis and Ed Cox.



https://nypost.com/2019/08/09/trump-cracks-jokes-about-rent-control-kamikaze-pilots-at-hamptons-fundraiser/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

canetoad

(17,195 posts)
17. Had to look up
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 03:39 AM
Aug 2019

Overton Window and glad I did.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overton_window

Noam Chomsky said in 1998:

The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum – even encourage the more critical and dissident views. That gives people the sense that there's free thinking going on, while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
18. Agreed...thanks to GoneOffShore for sharing that, and thank you for the clarification...
Sun Aug 11, 2019, 10:07 AM
Aug 2019

That's a new concept for me, and it certainly reflects where things stand.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After the last few days, ...