Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,986 posts)
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 07:26 PM Aug 2019

Fed Judge: 'Difficult to Reconcile' Mueller Report with AG Barr's Statements

A federal judge on Monday heard more than two hours of arguments regarding whether a less-redacted version of former special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on the Russia investigation should be released.

The proceeding stemmed from consolidated lawsuits filed by Buzzfeed News reporter Jason Leopold and the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), both of whom sought unredacted versions of the report via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) filings.

As lawyers for the Department of Justice argued in favor of not releasing a fuller version of the report, Federal District Judge Reggie Walton seemed particularly incredulous of some of their arguments against allowing the public access to portions of the report that remain redacted.

According to a report from The Hill, Walton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, was concerned about the conduct of Attorney General William Barr in the immediate aftermath of the report’s release and expressed concern that failing to disclose the reasons for prosecutorial decisions only “undermines even further” the public’s trust in the criminal justice system.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/fed-judge-difficult-to-reconcile-mueller-report-with-ag-barrs-statements/ar-AAFnz2U?li=BBnbcA1

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fed Judge: 'Difficult to Reconcile' Mueller Report with AG Barr's Statements (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2019 OP
K & R SunSeeker Aug 2019 #1
Thank you Judge Walton and Buzzfeed. BigmanPigman Aug 2019 #2
Is it possible he is the last hope we have to see the fully un-redacted version of the report. usaf-vet Aug 2019 #5
we need another Daniel Ellsberg type to just say "fuck it", bypass all this nonsense Tarc Aug 2019 #3
That would be nice. Blue_true Aug 2019 #4
An excellent idea! RobertDevereaux Aug 2019 #10
It's simple your honor. Barr lied. gibraltar72 Aug 2019 #6
As an attorney, if I acted like Barr misrepresenting the Mueller report I would have been at the Pepsidog Aug 2019 #7
you're kidding? triron Aug 2019 #8
I agree the judge was spot on. What I meant if I acted like Barr did when he misrepresented Pepsidog Aug 2019 #9
I thought you were perfectly clear on that. Ligyron Aug 2019 #12
Thanks for the clarification. Makes more sense. triron Aug 2019 #13
Ah, Jeez. IANAL but I love to see beagles argue amongst themselves.... erronis Aug 2019 #22
Could legal guilds weigh in? TheRickles Aug 2019 #15
I was wondering that myself and read somewhere, probably on DU, that anyone can file an ethics Pepsidog Aug 2019 #16
IANAL TheRickles Aug 2019 #17
I will look into it. Barr has disgraced the legal profession. Why should anyone ever tell the truth Pepsidog Aug 2019 #19
Thanks! TheRickles Aug 2019 #25
I know Judge Walton Solomon Aug 2019 #11
I must admit 90-percent Aug 2019 #14
Being a liar like Barr doesn't take a great deal of skill. Pepsidog Aug 2019 #20
Would that be enough to Disbar Bill Barr? JAD Aug 2019 #18
It should be but won't be enough. In fact any ethics complaint will probably be Pepsidog Aug 2019 #21
I don't know. The ABA doesn't like its reputation sullied by mobsters. erronis Aug 2019 #23
Unfortunately, you are probably correct. Pepsidog Aug 2019 #27
Jason Leopold. That name sounds familiar... madinmaryland Aug 2019 #24
Yeah, no shit. grumpyduck Aug 2019 #26
Just submitted a VA Bar complaint against the criminal Get Me Outta Here Aug 2019 #28
knr triron Aug 2019 #29
knr triron Aug 2019 #30

BigmanPigman

(51,593 posts)
2. Thank you Judge Walton and Buzzfeed.
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 09:32 PM
Aug 2019

Buzzfeed has reporters who stand up for their reporting. This isn't the first time they had to do this. I think I recall they did this with reporting about the Steele Dossier.

usaf-vet

(6,186 posts)
5. Is it possible he is the last hope we have to see the fully un-redacted version of the report.
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 09:54 PM
Aug 2019

We need to know how badly Barr skewed the results in the report to favor Trump.

If this judge doesn't open it for public scrutiny, will it ever see the full light of day?

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
3. we need another Daniel Ellsberg type to just say "fuck it", bypass all this nonsense
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 09:38 PM
Aug 2019

and just release it all to the public.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
4. That would be nice.
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 09:44 PM
Aug 2019

If that person goes to jail, the democratic President should pardon him or her on the first day in office, issue an apology on behalf of the nation and pay the person $1 million for each year in jail, and give the person his or her old job back of the person wants it.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
7. As an attorney, if I acted like Barr misrepresenting the Mueller report I would have been at the
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 10:27 PM
Aug 2019

very least reprimanded and maybe disbarred.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
9. I agree the judge was spot on. What I meant if I acted like Barr did when he misrepresented
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 10:36 PM
Aug 2019

Mueller’s report, I would have been brought up on ethics charges of misrepresentation and conduct bringing disrepute to the bar. I’m talking about Barr’s conduct, not the Judge Walton who I agree with.

erronis

(15,257 posts)
22. Ah, Jeez. IANAL but I love to see beagles argue amongst themselves....
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 06:40 PM
Aug 2019

As long as I'm not paying their modest fees.

TheRickles

(2,063 posts)
15. Could legal guilds weigh in?
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 04:05 PM
Aug 2019

Couldn't the ABA or ALA or one of those professional guilds render an opinion about Barr's conduct? They may not have the legal standing to reprimand or disbarr him, but a Letter of Concern or Op-Ed or something along those lines would be a very important counter to the White House's narrative about the Mueller Report.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
16. I was wondering that myself and read somewhere, probably on DU, that anyone can file an ethics
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 04:13 PM
Aug 2019

complaint against Barr. Lawyers are held to a higher standard and cannot just go out and say whatever they want. They cannot be misleading or being the bar into disrepute. I think the article I read was about how they went after Clinton’s law license as a result of lying during a deposition.

TheRickles

(2,063 posts)
17. IANAL
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 04:20 PM
Aug 2019

But apparently you are. So if you're a member of the ABA or ALA or something similar, could you suggest that they take such a course of action? I'm sure plenty of lawyers are disgusted by how their profession is being represented by Barr, and would love to find a way to give voice to their feelings.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
19. I will look into it. Barr has disgraced the legal profession. Why should anyone ever tell the truth
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 05:17 PM
Aug 2019

After the performances by Barr and Kavenaugh.

JAD

(187 posts)
18. Would that be enough to Disbar Bill Barr?
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 04:43 PM
Aug 2019

Take the Mueller Report and Barr's 4 page opposite of Mueller Report to a DC Judge.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
21. It should be but won't be enough. In fact any ethics complaint will probably be
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 05:39 PM
Aug 2019

summarily dismissed. The corruption runs deep in DC and there is no courage.

erronis

(15,257 posts)
23. I don't know. The ABA doesn't like its reputation sullied by mobsters.
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 06:43 PM
Aug 2019

Mainly.

However, being a fairly stodgy group of lawyers who have probably seen more than their share of questionable actions and verdicts, they may be a bit hesitant to call old cronies into question.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)
24. Jason Leopold. That name sounds familiar...
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 07:06 PM
Aug 2019

Oh yeah. He brought us Fitzmas here on DU in 2006 saying that KKKRove would be indicted in 24 business hours. I’m still waiting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fed Judge: 'Difficult to ...