Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just now on Morning Joe - Counties hosting Trump rallies in 2016 (Original Post) avebury Aug 2019 OP
Get thee to the greatest page malaise Aug 2019 #1
I just saw this on MJ and it is stunning! Chemisse Aug 2019 #2
If the statistics could be proven it would position victims and/or avebury Aug 2019 #21
A survey needs to be done on Scarsdale Aug 2019 #3
COME ON DNC, DCCC? pangaia Aug 2019 #5
You're kidding, right? THIS as an excuse to blame Democrats? Hortensis Aug 2019 #14
No, I am NOT blaming dems. But I am not kidding.. pangaia Aug 2019 #15
Take a good look at what this "ammo" did for you. Hortensis Aug 2019 #19
I understood Trump True Blue American Aug 2019 #18
Paywall. Ugh. NurseJackie Aug 2019 #4
Here's the core of the article: Ilsa Aug 2019 #6
Thank you! NurseJackie Aug 2019 #10
+1 dalton99a Aug 2019 #17
I suggest also that Trump's campaigning targets persons who are most likely to engage in violence. TryLogic Aug 2019 #24
Compelling. calimary Aug 2019 #28
K&R, more proof Trump is a dark force ... not just an a-hole but a dark force uponit7771 Aug 2019 #7
The Post generalized how they did their research, but it needs Ilsa Aug 2019 #8
The full Nazi bucolic_frolic Aug 2019 #9
Yes, good point. TryLogic Aug 2019 #25
and, many of these places have been stiffed NewJeffCT Aug 2019 #11
K&R... spanone Aug 2019 #12
KNR..nt N_E_1 for Tennis Aug 2019 #13
Who is surprised by this? Gothmog Aug 2019 #16
Kochs? Sinclair? Hannity? Limbaugh? Putin? Hermit-The-Prog Aug 2019 #20
K&R smirkymonkey Aug 2019 #22
Be careful with studies not peer reviewed Cicada Aug 2019 #23
It is quite possible to do legitimate statistical analyses without waiting for peer review. TryLogic Aug 2019 #26
One discredited story makes people ignore 100 good ones Cicada Aug 2019 #27

Chemisse

(30,811 posts)
2. I just saw this on MJ and it is stunning!
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 07:58 AM
Aug 2019

If these statistics are valid, it is pretty direct evidence that Trump is inciting violence.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
21. If the statistics could be proven it would position victims and/or
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 10:45 AM
Aug 2019

victims' families being able to file a class action lawsuit against Trump in civil court.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
3. A survey needs to be done on
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 08:29 AM
Aug 2019

how many cities that hosted his rallies have been paid for the extra security. El Paso held a rally, and tRump campaign never paid their bill of over $200,000 Taxpayers get saddled with that. VP Pence skipped out on his bill in Colorado, held at the restaurant owned by (oh, the horrors!) a gay man. He charged $35,000 a couple. These deadbeats are sucking off taxpayers enough. The authorities should demand payment up front, or refuse to let them hold a rally. THAT would cut down on hate speech.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
14. You're kidding, right? THIS as an excuse to blame Democrats?
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 09:17 AM
Aug 2019

If you think some incompetent can do the job, why not give it a swing yourself? But only if you can find the Republican Party to shoot at.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
15. No, I am NOT blaming dems. But I am not kidding..
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 09:23 AM
Aug 2019

my point being that repubs have given us SO MUCH ammo to use against them..

USE IT !!! Like they do.. ONLY with the truth....

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
19. Take a good look at what this "ammo" did for you.
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 10:13 AM
Aug 2019

If it can't focus your passions and energies on stopping the right (crisis emergency!), why do you think it'd work the way you imagine it must for others?

The Russians put many millions of posts with the very same sort of demoralizing anti-Democratic messages as yours on social media because that "ammo" kills Democrats. Get it?

You recognize that messaging can be an action, so maybe think about what action you should be taking.

True Blue American

(17,984 posts)
18. I understood Trump
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 10:10 AM
Aug 2019

Owed over $600,000 to El Paso.

He owes $17,000 to the tiny city of Lebanon, Ohio.

Now they are staring full fledged traing of Police Departments for mass killings.

Thank goodness Dayton had Police in the Oregon District. Responded in less than a minute, killed the gun man immediately saving dozens of lives.

All the while we have that thing is the WhiteHouse holding Hitleresque rallies.

Called the killer monstrous. Look in the mirror. Monster!

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
6. Here's the core of the article:
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 08:34 AM
Aug 2019
How we did our research

Using the Anti-Defamation League’s Hate, Extremism, Anti-Semitism, Terrorism map data (HEAT map), we examined whether there was a correlation between the counties that hosted one of Trump’s 275 presidential campaign rallies in 2016 and increased incidents of hate crimes in subsequent months.

To test this, we aggregated hate-crime incident data and Trump rally data to the county level and then used statistical tools to estimate a rally’s impact. We included controls for factors such as the county’s crime rates, its number of active hate groups, its minority populations, its percentage with college educations, its location in the country and the month when the rallies occurred.

We found that counties that had hosted a 2016 Trump campaign rally saw a 226 percent increase in reported hate crimes over comparable counties that did not host such a rally.

TryLogic

(1,723 posts)
24. I suggest also that Trump's campaigning targets persons who are most likely to engage in violence.
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 11:34 PM
Aug 2019

I have some example groups in mind, but the only group I think I should point to are males, and of course, racists.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
8. The Post generalized how they did their research, but it needs
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 08:37 AM
Aug 2019

to be verified. I believe it is probably true. But you know what they say about statistics: methodology can create more than one impression or conclusion in something as subjective as how crimes are classified at the local level.

bucolic_frolic

(43,161 posts)
9. The full Nazi
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 08:48 AM
Aug 2019

He's called himself a 'nationalist'. Yeah? Historians still debate Hitler's Nazi government. The focus has been on the war, of course, and the holocaust, of course again, but little attention is paid to the financial and economic aspects of the Nazi hierarchy. Those generals and the government bureaucracy were instruments of not only death but plunder. Gold, art, land, buildings, money - skimmed to private ownership, sometimes in Swiss bank accounts - Hitler had his own banker.

Have you noticed our public resources are being privatized by the thugs Trump has appointed?

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
22. K&R
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 11:25 AM
Aug 2019

and bookmarked. He needs to go. And the rallies need to stop and his twitter account needs to be shut down. This man is a danger to the people of this country.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
23. Be careful with studies not peer reviewed
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 04:22 PM
Aug 2019

If there is not a peer reviewed version of this I would be cautious

TryLogic

(1,723 posts)
26. It is quite possible to do legitimate statistical analyses without waiting for peer review.
Mon Aug 5, 2019, 11:39 PM
Aug 2019

This does not appear to be challenging data to analyze.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
27. One discredited story makes people ignore 100 good ones
Tue Aug 6, 2019, 08:24 AM
Aug 2019

I think that we should be extremely cautious. I saw an interview with an author of the October 2018 NYT article on massive tax fraud by the Trump family. He described why the NYT performed extreme fact checking before publication. They used a dozen of the top tax experts in America to confirm their conclusions. They had to prove the accuracy of literally every word to outside lawyers. Because they knew an error would discredit not just the NYT but all journalism in the US. The cost of an error would be catastrophic. A single error will be used to discredit every valid claim.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just now on Morning Joe -...