General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcConnell Received Donations from Voting Machine Lobbyists Before Blocking Election Security Bills
This is American democracy's structural problem, folks. By design.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/mitch-mcconnell-received-donations-from-voting-machine-lobbyists-before-blocking-election-security-bills/ar-AAEUGcx?ocid=spartanntp&fbclid=IwAR17TKRxNCc5maJwIf8-xHY1FfpA3lD0S2KlBhwKZEMNVwbW083AaIW2OMc
"It's not surprising to me that Mitch McConnell is receiving these campaign contributions," the Brennan Center for Justice's Lawrence Norden told Sludge last month. "He seems single-handedly to be standing in the way of anything passing in Congress around election security, and that includes things that the vendors might want, like money for the states to replace antiquated equipment."
McConnell's actions seemed even more out of balance with his party, as the Senate Intelligence Committeeled by Republicansreleased a report later on Thursday claiming Russians have targeted voting systems in all 50 states in 2016. Though there was no evidence votes were changed, in Illinois "Russian cyberactors were in a position to delete or change voter data."
In 2018, there were 14 states that used electronic voting systems in 2018 with no paper trail, that means that if votes were inaccurately tallied or machines malfunctioned, there would be no way to investigate or recover those votes. Voting machine companies are not currently subject to any federally-mandated security standards.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)mitch96
(13,912 posts)You or I do it and it's called a bribe.... Them??? politics..... No wonder they never want to leave...
m
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)THINK THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW....
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/22/us-voting-machine-private-companies-voter-registration
That is not likely. Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell has been antagonistic to election reform bills, as has the whole Republican party. The party narrative is that Democrats are trying to use the federal government to take over state and local elections; the political angle is that recognizing vulnerabilities or flaws in the election system could raise doubts about the legitimacy of the partys and Donald Trumps victory in 2016.
Hey mcturte..who is gaslighting who.....
ancianita
(36,095 posts)alwaysinasnit
(5,066 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)This is a clear conflict of interest and an example of a politician interfering in our voting process. I don't understand how he can get away with this.
ancianita
(36,095 posts)federal elections are of overarching national interest.
Lawyers are so busy these days it's probably in the queue.
Also, a pattern of conflicts of interest behavior might bring an abuse of power or conflict of interest case.
I wish at least one of our leaders might look into this.