Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
17 replies, 2095 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
17 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did you watch Rachel tonite? You might be very alarmed. eos. (Original Post)
triron
Jul 2019
OP
Why in the hell do you not post one sentence of what you were trying to say? NT
USALiberal
Jul 2019
#11
"I saw Rachel tonight and I know a secret! If you didn't watch her, Ha Ha on you!"
NBachers
Jul 2019
#14
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)1. No. What now?
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,818 posts)2. No, so could you please explain why we should be alarmed?
PufPuf23
(8,813 posts)3. Would be helpful if you put some content in your OP.
Many things to be alarmed about at present.
FirstLight
(13,362 posts)4. yes....
big hard hit after a fun loving weekend @ SF Pride...
brooklynite
(94,698 posts)5. I didn't, and you didn't tell me why I should be.
VOX
(22,976 posts)6. How about a single sentence regarding content/context? n/t
Golden Raisin
(4,612 posts)7. A clue or context would be helpful.
JustFiveMoreMinutes
(2,133 posts)8. Perhaps Climate Change?
Rachel Maddow shined a light on how Donald Trump and his anti-science administration are trying to cover up scientific research about climate change.
The MSNBC host said its just the latest example of how the contrast between the Trump administration and the 20+ Democrats running for office couldnt be clearer.
https://www.politicususa.com/2019/07/01/rachel-maddow-exposes-trumps-massive-cover-up-of-climate-change-research.html
pangaia
(24,324 posts)9. Ya wanna give us morons who can;t guess a little hint?
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)10. Probably referring to her first segment
which was about how a bunch of USDA scientists are going to be let go in a few weeks and there isn't much, if anything, that can be done to stop this.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)11. Why in the hell do you not post one sentence of what you were trying to say? NT
Elwood P Dowd
(11,443 posts)12. Trump is firing most of the scientists
with the USDA. In two weeks the USDA will be toast.
Demovictory9
(32,468 posts)15. omg
MFM008
(19,818 posts)13. Scientists being fired
In 2 weeks.
NBachers
(17,135 posts)14. "I saw Rachel tonight and I know a secret! If you didn't watch her, Ha Ha on you!"
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)16. It is terribly depressing.
OnDoutside
(19,968 posts)17. So much for Britain to look forward to, after Brexit !