General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump threat: "Delay the Census"
Link to tweet
Let us again be clear; this is his usual lack of impulse control, rather than an actual policy.
Raven
(13,897 posts)hlthe2b
(102,320 posts)Amishman
(5,559 posts)I read Roberts ruling as 'this looks really racist. Go back and do the same thing but take your klan hood off this time'.
They push Census Day from April to July (probably get a lower response rate in the summer, so a bonus for them). Trump's minions fire up the bullshit generator and spin machine, and come up with new reasons. Court right goes back to SCOTUS. Roberts flips back to the right side, puts out a short vague opinion, and lets the question stand. Shorter timeframe lowers oversight and response rate, which probably benefits the Pubs.
hlthe2b
(102,320 posts)The clock is ticking, with the administration previously saying that census forms needed to be printed in the coming days. A determination from a federal agency normally would take weeks or months.
There is really no time. And if the administration tries to rush it that is clearly a red flag, said Dale Ho, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, one of the challengers.
Jason Torchinsky, a lawyer and Republican redistricting strategist, said the deadline could be extended to the fall, which would enable the Supreme Court to review the new decision.
They dont need to redo the entire administrative process, they just need to better justify what they did, in a way that can satisfy the Supreme Court, Torchinsky said.
Justice Department spokeswoman Kelly Laco said the administration is disappointed by the Supreme Courts decision. The Department of Justice will continue to defend this administrations lawful exercises of executive power, Laco said in a statement.
The census, required by the U.S. Constitution, is used to allot seats in the U.S. House and distribute some $800 billion in federal funds. Opponents have said the question would instill fear in immigrant households that the information would be shared with law enforcement, deterring them from taking part.
Further muddying the waters, there is also ongoing litigation in lower courts over recently unearthed evidence that the challengers have said reveals an illegal discriminatory motive by the administration for adding the question, which the high court could yet weigh in on.
The court ruled against the challengers in a separate 5-4 vote, with all the conservative justices in the majority, that the U.S. Constitution does not in theory prevent the administration or a future one from adding a citizenship question.
CanonRay
(14,111 posts)He's pissed on every other clause in the Constitution
Zoonart
(11,875 posts)Article 1 Section 2 of the Constitution, idjit.
underpants
(182,848 posts)Zoonart
(11,875 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,545 posts)CanonRay
(14,111 posts)what clause of the Constitution has he not passed on.
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)He doesn't care about that though. He wipes his decrepit butt with the Constitution every day.
MineralMan
(146,320 posts)You don't get to stop constitutionally mandated things, you overweening asshole!
underpants
(182,848 posts)Like how he overvalues all his assets especially the golf ones
MattP
(3,304 posts)Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)This smells an awful lot like a trial balloon for the 2020 election.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)so it can be issued by a Democratic president
malaise
(269,103 posts)Fuck off monster!
Liberal In Texas
(13,563 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,336 posts)when there was a danger it would be about Wilbur Ross, or even the dead guy.
2) This helps feed the grievances of his base. They want to feel that "the system" is responsible for their failures, so Trump is putting himself forward as the guy who has been unjustly hurt by "the system" (yes, for him, the US Constitution is "the system" - those paintings by the asshole of Trump being the guy who respects the Constitution are the biggest pile of bullshit, as we all know).
So Trump's handlers have allowed this tweet, since it fires up the base. It doesn't matter that he's fighting the constitution, because his base won't believe anything anyone other than him says on the topic. He can come back a few hours later with a whine that "I'm told activist judges will block Common Sense - Enemies of the People!!!" or similar bullshit, and his base will slurp up the turds with a shit-eating grin.