General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLeft-Wing Group Announces List Of House Democrats To Unseat
So I thought I was pretty on top of the news but I guess not, this is news to me...(Huffington Post) Roots Action, a left-wing group led largely by supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), drafted a report on 15 House members it considers ripe targets for progressive primary challenges, arming the Democratic Partys populist wing with a new organizing tool as it seeks to unseat a growing number of incumbents.
Roots Action, which is calling its analysis Bad Blues: Some of the House Democrats Who Deserve to Be Primaried, hopes the report can serve as a road map and source of encouragement for individuals or groups considering a primary run.
The incumbent House members its identifies are: Cheri Bustos of Illinois, who chairs House Democrats campaign arm; Jim Cooper of Tennessee; Jim Costa of California; Henry Cuellar of Texas; Eliot Engel of New York; Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey; Jim Himes of Connecticut; Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland; Derek Kilmer of Washington; Dan Lipinski of Illinois; Gregory Meeks of New York; Brad Schneider of Illinois; Kurt Schrader of Oregon; David Scott of Georgia; and Juan Vargas of California.
SNIP
The reports authors noted though that it is by no means exhaustive ― only illustrative.
Waleed Shahid, a spokesman for Justice Democrats, a group that backed Ocasio-Cortez and now-Rep. Ayanna Pressley in their primary wins last year and has recruited challengers to run against Cuellar and Engel, described the advent of the report as a sign of the times.
The upset victories by Ayanna Pressley and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have revealed more enthusiasm for more primary challengers and a different model of representation in the Democratic Party, he said. Everyone should be looking over their shoulder.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/roots-action-bad-blues-report-progressive-primary-challenges-house-democrats-dccc_n_5d0d4e93e4b07ae90d9d21e8
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,683 posts)I think what they want to do is extremely counterproductive and could well split the party.
Lady Freedom Returns
(14,120 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)My first thought was that I wish they would put their effort into unseating Republicans!
still_one
(92,372 posts)struggle4progress
(118,332 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)are extremely revealing. As is the fact that the groups these types form never achieve their avowed goals before they self destruct. They can act as spoilers for the Democratic Party, though.
Notably, Sanders' role in America's 2016 disaster was not the first time for him. He ran for governor long ago as candidate for an obscure third party. He lost, enormously and completely inevitably; and although the anti-Democratic party he allied with did just as inevitably eventually collapse, they did succeed in splitting off just enough voters to defeat the Democratic incumbent and elect the Republican. They didn't count the costs to the people, no guilt or shame at all. As Sanders has said probably hundreds of times in many ways, Dems and Repugs are really just "Tweedledum and Tweedledee."
As for this OP, silly stuff. Despite their claims, these groups failed bad in both 2016 and the big blue wave of 2018. Thank the people who elected Obama twice. They want to mount a LW populist revolution to take over and "reform" the Democratic Party (ALL populist revolutions are reform, RW and LW, even those where the only change is which corrupt cadre starts sacking their nation), but the Republicans/Trump have cornered most of the populist market because they do it so much better.
radical noodle
(8,012 posts)EveHammond13
(2,855 posts)Thekaspervote
(32,789 posts)This is why I do not support aoc
Turin_C3PO
(14,033 posts)She supported Nancy Pelosi for Speaker.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)that the radical leaders who helped elect her and came to DC with her as executives to set up her new office have packed both her personal and congressional staffs with their own sort. Chakrabarti is her chief of staff, after all. He's cleaned up his act big time since he told the nation Justice Democrats might have to require her to sacrifice her congressional seat in pursuit of its great goals, that sacrifice apparently small potatoes in the big picture.
I think we can provisionally assume his new employer put her foot down, but just how much can she control them? They're IT and propaganda experts and could make bad enemies if she filed for divorce.
Turin_C3PO
(14,033 posts)There has been, on some radical left sites, disappointment that she generally supports Pelosis agenda. Their disappointment is a good thing, IMO.
Im all for left-wing politics but it must be done with pragmatism and within the Democratic Party.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)FakeNoose
(32,726 posts)... it's Bernie Sanders that I don't support. I don't believe he should even belong on our DU primary candidates list. He's not a Democrat and apparently, neither are most of his fan-boys.
Just sayin'
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,587 posts)hlthe2b
(102,343 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts).
.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)He's fairly moderate, but before he was in office, that district was represented by moderate Republicans for decades before him - 1970 to 2010.
Why not challenge Seth Moulton or Tim Ryan?
Cueller in TX I can understand.
mcar
(42,372 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)just to get some information. Cheri Bustos was the first Democrat elected in her district. Sounds like it would be idiotic to try to put in someone to the far left of her. That would be a sure way to lose to a Republican. I don't think these people put much thought into pragmatic political thought.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)They're going after her seat because they think it might be gettable and she's not one of theirs. And they're perfectly willing to lose the seat to a Republican.
Takket
(21,620 posts)But this is a TERRIBLE waste of resources when we are fighting for the very life of this country.
Turin_C3PO
(14,033 posts)DFW
(54,436 posts)"Everyone should be looking over their shoulder."
I thought all the Stalinists these days were in the Republican Party.
The so-called "Justice Democrats" are definitely NOT "Just us" Democrats.
wryter2000
(46,077 posts)Just go away.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)ripcord
(5,507 posts)It isn't like we wanted to keep a majority in the House anyways. /sarcasm
we can do it
(12,190 posts)RandySF
(59,167 posts)onecaliberal
(32,888 posts)STOP
bdamomma
(63,919 posts)someone who confessed to grabbing women by the pu**y, haven't we been abused enough by this POS.
Tech
(1,771 posts)Are you being funded by Susan Sarandon?
murielm99
(30,755 posts)The district will go red if they keep screwing around. Shouldn't these people be serving their constituents instead of taking time to divide the Democratic Party?
GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Nitram
(22,861 posts)unseating Trump, and gaining a majority in both houses of congress.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)those who've registered Democrat and are attacking from "inside." After all, when a New Mexico Republican can register his Labrador to vote as a Democrat... The owner meant it as an insult, but we all know Labs are liberal by nature, which would IMO make Buddy a truer Democrat than these.
CrispyQ
(36,502 posts)but they are going to put their energy into primarying dems?
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,170 posts)The worst Democrat is usually better than the best Republican.
bottomofthehill
(8,344 posts)They are willing to attack everyone, African American Members, Hispanic Members, Jewish Members, That conservative bastion Elliot Engel, that right wing nut Greg Meeks, that dead beat do nothing Steny Hoyer.......... Its always best to attack those who helped take the majority.
Nitram
(22,861 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Our Revolution, Justice Democrats, Brand New Congress and the Democratic Socialists of America endorsed a combined 107 candidates for Congress this year. Forty-four of them won their primaries and only 12 won their general elections. Five of those 12 were already incumbents. Five more of them were longtime party politicians in line for higher office, rather than insurgent candidates. Only two of them were actually opposed by the party and unseated establishment Democrats in the primaries Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ayanna Pressley. There are 435 members of Congress.
It gets worse. Almost every candidate those groups endorsed for governor, lieutenant governor, and Senate, lost in the primary or the general election. That includes 13 candidates for governor, five candidates for lt. governor, and seven candidates for U.S. Senate. Incumbents Bernie Sanders and David Zuckerman were the only ones who won. Several candidates were high-profile individuals who raised millions of dollars: progressives such as Ben Jealous, Cynthia Nixon and Abdul El-Sayed. Others such as Andrew Gillum and Stacy Abrams took millions from big donors."
This clip is from a radical site that goes on to deplore the Democratic blue wave that filled hundreds of offices with "corporatist" Democrats, but the dishonesty about Democrats characteristic of LW extremists hasn't interfered with their ability to count wins and losses. Their honesty doesn't go so far as to explicitly point out, however, that by far most of the candidates they endorsed didn't endorse them. After Sanders endorsed about 3 people in 2016 and had no great victories to claim, they took a lesson and expanded to cover people like Stacy Abrams who are anything but LW extremists and/or populists. They are able to claim they helped elect exactly 2 of their own, and of those Ocasio-Cortez is sorta looking like she'd like to realign. If they didn't take her out in reprisal?
mcar
(42,372 posts)They say it's ok for Sanders to vote against gun control legislation because he's serving his constituents, but these Dems must be primaried bc they aren't pure enough?
jalan48
(13,881 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Leith
(7,813 posts)I won't post it, but he has a tweet about establishing sharia law nationwide. He's astonishingly tone deaf about Americans.