Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBen Rhodes: Trump's Iran policy is rooted in lies -- the kind that got us into the Iraq War Failing
I trust what Ben Rhodes says.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Trumps Iran policy is rooted in lies the kind that got us into the Iraq War
Failing to see his dishonesty for what it is could have devastating consequences.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/05/16/trumps-iran-policy-is-rooted-lies-kind-that-got-us-into-iraq-war/?utm_term=.ae8117af961a
By Ben Rhodes
Ben Rhodes, a deputy national security adviser during the Obama administration, is author of "The World as It Is."
The Iraq War showed us all what happens when exaggerations and lies are weaponized to justify an ideological push for war: In 2002 and 2003, a relentless series of ominous, overblown public statements and bogus intelligence reports were used to justify an invasion part of a deliberate campaign to make an offensive military action look defensive: Should Saddam Hussein choose confrontation, President George W. Bush said, the American people can know that every measure has been taken to avoid war.
It wasnt true. Yet Bush made the case that the United States had to attack before Hussein could use weapons of mass destruction that Iraq didnt really have. Now a similar cycle of deception may be repeating itself with President Trumps increasingly belligerent posture on Iran.
Trumps Iran policy has long been rooted in falsehoods. In 2017, his administration refused to certify the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) the Iran nuclear deal on the premise that Iran wasnt complying with the terms. That wasnt true. Earlier that year, the International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed Irans compliance; the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reported to Congress that Iran is adhering to its JCPOA obligations; and the U.S. intelligence community presented no evidence justifying Trumps decertification.
Trumps subsequent decision to withdraw from the JCPOA was no surprise. For years, he had railed against it as the worst deal ever negotiated by tossing out a raft of easily debunked assertions: that Iran was given $150 billion under the terms of the deal, a claim The Washington Posts Fact Checker rated with four Pinocchios; that Irans regime was verging on total collapse before the deal, implying that somehow the deal lent the regime new life. After pulling out, Trump has continued to dispute his own intelligence communitys assessment that Iran had been complying. Numbed to a president who lies so regularly that its become the background noise to our political culture, his reckless exit from a multilateral, U.N. Security Council-endorsed arms-control agreement that wasnt being violated was treated as just another routine turn of events in Trumps Washington.
Since then, Trumps administration has made every effort to manufacture a crisis with Iran. To the dismay of our closest European allies, the administration has repeatedly imposed new sanctions; officially designated Irans Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization; announced an Iran Action Group in the same week as the 65th anniversary of a U.S.-backed coup in Iran; threatened, via a tweeted-out video message from national security adviser John Bolton, that the Iranian regime wouldnt have many more anniversaries to enjoy; and hinted that the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force against al-Qaeda and associated forces could be applied to war with Iran.
This month, the manufactured crisis was escalated. Bolton announced the deployment of a U.S. aircraft carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the region, referencing unspecified troubling and escalatory indications and warnings from Iran that could lead to the use of unrelenting force by the United States. Days later, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned that any attacks from Iran or its proxies would be met with a swift and decisive U.S. response. The State Department has drawn down some of our personnel in nearby Baghdad, again citing unspecified threats from Iran.
Our allies have contradicted this view:...........................
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 513 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post