Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawyers for the Trump Administration blocked Ms. Hicks from answering questions 155 times. (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl Jun 2019 OP
I like this bit: The Velveteen Ocelot Jun 2019 #1
Yeahbutwhatabout . . . gratuitous Jun 2019 #2
Did she invite the White House lawyers, or did they impose themselves fierywoman Jun 2019 #3
I think they had various clients dixiegrrrrl Jun 2019 #6
Thanks for the info and I totally agree that it has to be played out... fierywoman Jun 2019 #7
With McGahn, it was threats against the law firm McGahn was working for dixiegrrrrl Jun 2019 #8
Keep your powder dry watoos Jun 2019 #4
Amazing ilmare2000 Jun 2019 #5

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
2. Yeahbutwhatabout . . .
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 06:25 PM
Jun 2019

Hillary Clinton? She only appeared for 11 hours of live, open testimony before Trey Gowdy's committee (which also featured Mike Pompeo and Gym Jordan). Sure, she answered each and every question, even the stupid ones, didn't invoke some bogus immunity privilege that doesn't exist, and she didn't have a lawyer sitting right beside her, but come on! Hillary Clinton.

There! Hope Hicks is vindicated forever.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
6. I think they had various clients
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 09:04 PM
Jun 2019

She showed up with them, have no idea who the real owners are, and esp. who is paying them.

I do get the idea she is in same mess as the McGahn and the others, who have been threatened by Trump.
In any event, the game has to be played out....trump's bs reasons to stop them, the Committees having to go to court to counter his crap, etc.

fierywoman

(7,685 posts)
7. Thanks for the info and I totally agree that it has to be played out...
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 09:10 PM
Jun 2019

..."perseverance furthers" as the ancient Chinese said ...

Given her dating history that we're aware of, tRump probably has Kompromat on her.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
8. With McGahn, it was threats against the law firm McGahn was working for
Fri Jun 21, 2019, 12:45 AM
Jun 2019

I suspect bribery/intimidation/threats, whatever works.
But...as soon as there is a court ordered subpoena, the witness can fairly say their testimony is required. But treason weasel and Barr are making every inch of progress a battle.
 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
4. Keep your powder dry
Thu Jun 20, 2019, 06:41 PM
Jun 2019

Don’t fire until you see the whites of their eyes.
It’s too soon.

Don Jr set the parameters of his testimony.
He set the time limits, he set the topics, he set the conditions. His testimony was a waste of time.
3..2..1 before “someone “ posts about how Dems kissing Jr’s ass will set well with the courts.

Impeach now. These legislative hearings are being abused by Trump/Barr, it is time for a judicial impeachment hearing that carries more clout with the courts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawyers for the Trump Adm...