Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,034 posts)
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 08:07 PM Jun 2019

Judge in census case: New evidence alleging political motivation behind citizenship question 'raises

In a blow to the Trump administration, a federal trial judge said Wednesday that he believes new evidence presented in a challenge to the 2020 census citizenship question "raises a substantial issue."

The decision could lead to reopening one of three federal trials into the citizenship question and lead to further examinations of Republican redistricting consultant Thomas Hofeller's role in developing the question.

Earlier this month, the ACLU and a team of lawyers at Arnold & Porter said that they had obtained a trove of documents from Hofeller, a deceased Republican redistricting expert who, they allege, played a significant role in the decision to add the question. Hofeller wrote a study in 2015 concluding that using "citizen voting age" population as the redistricting population base would be "advantageous to Republicans and Non-Hispanic Whites."

The administration has always denied political motivation, saying instead that the Justice Department had determined that the question was necessary to better comply with federal voting rights law.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-in-census-case-new-evidence-alleging-political-motivation-behind-citizenship-question-raises-a-substantial-issue/ar-AAD7Tto?li=BBnb7Kz

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge in census case: New evidence alleging political motivation behind citizenship question 'raises (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2019 OP
They never brought up how the question could provide ICE with an address to raid. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2019 #1
Lies and Liars, the Law stands tall saidsimplesimon Jun 2019 #2
I believe the judicial branch is going to save us FakeNoose Jun 2019 #3

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. They never brought up how the question could provide ICE with an address to raid.
Wed Jun 19, 2019, 08:15 PM
Jun 2019


And THAT is very dis-concerting.

altho...if the question was merely "are a citizen?"...everyone could truthfully answer yes.

they probably thought of that, tho....sigh.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge in census case: New...