Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,703 posts)
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 11:20 AM Jun 2019

The Supreme Court's Virginia uranium ruling hints at the limits of federal power

Published 4 mins ago on June 18, 2019
By The Conversation

Virginia has the authority to ban uranium mining under state law, even as the federal government regulates the processing of nuclear fuel under the Atomic Energy Act, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Neil Gorsuch, joined by the court’s longest-serving and newest conservatives – Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh – rejected the idea that Congress’ plan for nuclear enrichment could override Virginia’s decision to prohibit uranium mining altogether. On that point, these three conservatives were in sync with three of the court’s liberals, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. This remarkably diverse coalition agreed that the “Commonwealth’s mining ban is not preempted” by federal authority. Chief Justice John Roberts filed a dissent.

I have been involved in this case, Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren, in its various iterations for more than a decade. Before joining the faculty at the University of Virginia School of Law, I worked with the Southern Environmental Law Center, an environmental advocacy organization that had raised grave concerns about a proposed uranium mine near the city of Danville.

All three of the opinions published in Virginia Uranium, Inc. v. Warren are likely to prove significant in future environmental battles – both in the courts and in the court of public opinion.

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/06/the-supreme-courts-virginia-uranium-ruling-hints-at-the-limits-of-federal-power/


So now lets see what Roberts does in this upcoming lawsuit, he can run, but Roberts cannot hide:

JULIANA v. UNITED STATES
Youth Climate Lawsuit

https://www.ourchildrenstrust.org/juliana-v-us

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Supreme Court's Virginia uranium ruling hints at the limits of federal power (Original Post) turbinetree Jun 2019 OP
Unfortunately the author of that story does not really understand the case hueymahl Jun 2019 #1

hueymahl

(2,497 posts)
1. Unfortunately the author of that story does not really understand the case
Tue Jun 18, 2019, 12:11 PM
Jun 2019

The holding was really far more limited, and had little to do with states rights. The court simply said that the statute did not cover mining. If the statute had covered mining, then the court almost certainly would have found preemption.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Supreme Court's Virgi...