General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDogs' Eyes Have Changed Since Humans Befriended Them
Bill Kristol@BillKristol·5h
"Dogs faces are structured for complex expression in a way that wolves arent, thanks to a special pair of muscles framing their eyes....Domesticated dogs may have evolved a specialized ability used expressly to communicate better with humans."
Link to tweet
----
very interesting.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)like you would see in the cartoons
He is definitely a mama's boy
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)they truly are man's (woman's) best friend
Demovictory9
(32,457 posts)trueblue2007
(17,228 posts)mopinko
(70,127 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)With their sweet little faces and soulful eyes. I just melt when they give me "the eyes". I am putty in their paws.
dalton99a
(81,515 posts)Nagasawa et al. (13) showed that, between dogs and humans (but not wolves and humans), mutual gaze seems to lead to an oxytocin feedback loop analogous to the one that exists between human mothers and infants. Oxytocin has a fundamental role during affiliative behaviors in mammals and during the onset of maternal behavior and mother?infant attachment (14). Similarly, mutual gaze between dogs and humans seems to trigger an increase of oxytocin in both species, which then increases the motivation to establish eye contact (13). As this cross-species oxytocin loop can be found in dogs and humans, but not between dogs closest living relative (the wolf) and humans, selection processes during domestication must have played an important role whereby dogs hijacked the human caregiving response (15). The most likely evolutionary scenario is that dogs ancestor must have, to some extent, expressed characteristics that elicited a caregiving response from humans. Humans then consciously or unconsciously favored and therefore selected for those characteristics, leading to the analogous adaptations we see in dogs today.
Selection for traits that facilitate eye contact between dogs and humans might have, therefore, led to 1) anatomical differences in the facial musculature around the eyes between dogs and wolves and 2) behavioral differences between the species in terms of how they use these muscles to promote eye contact. We know that humans favor dogs that show paedomorphic (infantlike) anatomical features like a large forehead, large eyes, and so on; in studies asking people to select pictures presenting dog (or cat) faces, people prefer the faces that present paedomorphic features over others (16). Importantly, paedomorphic facial features can be even further exaggerated by facial muscle movements, which act to enhance the appearance of specific facial features (particularly the eyes). Waller et al. (17) showed that a specific facial muscle movement around the eyes (which they termed AU101: inner eyebrow raise) seems to be particularly attractive to humans. The movement makes the eyes appear bigger, hence more infant-like and potentially more appealing to humans. This inner brow raise also resembles a facial movement humans produce when they are sad, potentially eliciting a nurturing response from humans (17, 18). The study showed that dogs that produce this facial movement more were rehomed from a shelter more quickly than those that produced the movement less often, suggesting that the production of this eye movement gives dogs a potential selection advantage. No other facial movement had the same effect (17). However, thus far, it has been unknown whether domestication has shaped this phenomenon, and whether dogs show marked differences from wolves in anatomy and behavior in relation to this facial movement.
....
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/06/11/1820653116
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)we were completely in sync and had totally understanding of each other I truly believe. 🐕
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)The special dog offshoot of the precursor to wolves and dogs.
Who's to say?
Dogs have expressive faces. The anxious face, the "can I have some of that chicken" face, the happy face, the "I'm so sleepy I can't stay awake one more......zzzzzzzz" face...
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Neither would exist without our directing of evolution. Both done by preliterate humans. Who were as human as we are.
Princetonian
(1,501 posts)Where have all the PNAC conservatives gone?!
sandensea
(21,639 posts)I'm surprised Kristol hasn't been beating the war drums on Iran these last few days.
Princetonian
(1,501 posts)Jeb crashed and burned. I can see him running in 2024 though once the memory of his hapless performance in 2016 fades a bit.
sandensea
(21,639 posts)They're nothing if not Machiavellian.
They know the orange blob isn't going to be re-elected, and would rather bide their time - much like they did during the Clinton years.
You'll recall old man Bush had planned to re-invade Iraq after the '92 election (probably '95 - for maximum electoral effect).
The idea - as PNAC itself practically admitted - was to stage some false flag incident, and then announce to an expectant nation that (Jim Carvey voice here) "I didn't wanna do it - but Saddamussein has left me no choice."
They, of course, eventually got their chance.
Cheeto obviously thinks these Iran provocations could do the same for him.
But attacking a Japanese tanker - while Japan's PM is holding a summit in Tehran?
Something that stupid had to Cheeto's idea.