Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFake news will thrive as long we are happy to see only what we want to see
If a gorilla walked right in front of your eyes, you wouldnt miss it, would you? Actually, half the country probably would.
In a classic 1999 experiment, psychologists Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons showed people a video of basketball players, some wearing white shirts, some wearing black, and asked them to count how many times the players in white passed the ball. Halfway through the film, a woman in a gorilla suit saunters into the scene, faces the audience, thumps her chest and walks away. Extraordinarily, more than half of Chabriss and Simonss subjects were so intent on watching the ball being thrown that they failed to see the gorilla.
The experiment poses important questions about the reliance of eyewitness accounts. It also has a bearing on the way we access information, including news. Two stories last week illustrate how we often see what we expect, or want, to see.
The first is the tragic story of Dutch teenager Noa Pothoven. Sexually assaulted and raped as a young girl, Pothovens pain led to post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anorexia.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jun/08/fake-news-will-thrive-as-long-as-we-are-happy-to-see-what-we-want-to-see?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium=&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1560018422
In a classic 1999 experiment, psychologists Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons showed people a video of basketball players, some wearing white shirts, some wearing black, and asked them to count how many times the players in white passed the ball. Halfway through the film, a woman in a gorilla suit saunters into the scene, faces the audience, thumps her chest and walks away. Extraordinarily, more than half of Chabriss and Simonss subjects were so intent on watching the ball being thrown that they failed to see the gorilla.
The experiment poses important questions about the reliance of eyewitness accounts. It also has a bearing on the way we access information, including news. Two stories last week illustrate how we often see what we expect, or want, to see.
The first is the tragic story of Dutch teenager Noa Pothoven. Sexually assaulted and raped as a young girl, Pothovens pain led to post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anorexia.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jun/08/fake-news-will-thrive-as-long-as-we-are-happy-to-see-what-we-want-to-see?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium=&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1560018422
Yep.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 532 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fake news will thrive as long we are happy to see only what we want to see (Original Post)
demmiblue
Jun 2019
OP
Scientifically, personal recollections are the least reliable source for data...
Wounded Bear
Jun 2019
#3
JHB
(37,161 posts)1. The described video from the 1999 experiment
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)2. Thanks, I was just about to search for it.
Jim__
(14,077 posts)4. A somewhat different video of the invisible gorilla.
This is linked from the video in post #1:
It's worth watching the whole thing. I don't think what's happening when we watch these videos and what's going on with fake news are really the same issue.
Missing the gorilla is a matter of being focused on one thing and so missing things that are outside of your focus. Fake news is about deliberately ignoring information that you know is available.
Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)3. Scientifically, personal recollections are the least reliable source for data...
I remember an episode of my fave police procedural. After a bank robbery, the agents canvassed the witnesses and got like 5 different colors for the getaway vehicle, and several different descriptions of the perps. That's probably a bit closer to real life than the typical TV show/movie. The 'average' person makes for crappy witnesses for the most part.
That's how Dirty Donny's daily "squirrel!" Tweet works to divert attention.