Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
**Breaking** Fed Judge Sullivan announced that he will not force Justice Dept to comply w prev order
Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan announced in a filing on Tuesday that he will not force the Justice Department to comply with his previous order to release records relating to Michael Flynn,, President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser who was charged as a part of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation.
Last week, the Justice Department boldly defied Sullivan’s orders in a filing, saying that it was refusing to release the audio recordings of Flynn’s discussions with Russian officials, which would include his conversations with Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn pleaded guilty in late 2017 for lying to the FBI about the content of these conversations during the Trump administration’s transition period.
https://www.alternet.org/2019/06/a-federal-judge-just-let-the-justice-department-get-away-with-defying-the-order-to-release-michael-flynn-records/
--snip--
But Sullivan’s response on Tuesday makes those interpretations less likely.“The government is not required to file any additional materials or information on the public docket pursuant to the Court’s Orders of May 16, 2019,” the judge’s filing said.
“It was surprising for the court to have asked for these transcripts to be publicly filed in the first place, but it’s even more surprising to see the court back down in the face of outright DOJ refusal,” said Lawfare Executive Editor Susan Hennessey in a tweet. “I’d imagine there was lots of back and forth behind the scenes here.”
She added that it’s possible Sullivan agreed to let the government file the materials under seal.
Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti said: “I’m surprised by this move, because the information would appear to be relevant to the factors that he is required to consider at sentencing. He appears to be deferring to DOJ’s view of what is relevant.”
https://www.alternet.org/2019/06/a-federal-judge-just-let-the-justice-department-get-away-with-defying-the-order-to-release-michael-flynn-records/
--snip--
But Sullivan’s response on Tuesday makes those interpretations less likely.“The government is not required to file any additional materials or information on the public docket pursuant to the Court’s Orders of May 16, 2019,” the judge’s filing said.
“It was surprising for the court to have asked for these transcripts to be publicly filed in the first place, but it’s even more surprising to see the court back down in the face of outright DOJ refusal,” said Lawfare Executive Editor Susan Hennessey in a tweet. “I’d imagine there was lots of back and forth behind the scenes here.”
She added that it’s possible Sullivan agreed to let the government file the materials under seal.
Former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti said: “I’m surprised by this move, because the information would appear to be relevant to the factors that he is required to consider at sentencing. He appears to be deferring to DOJ’s view of what is relevant.”
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
