General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBarr said in his CBS interview that he hopes to bring his investigation of HRC 'to fruition' soon
What is this nonsense all about and how will we all respond once he does bring the investigation of Madame Secretary to fruition? What the hell does the bastard even mean by the word fruition? I know the dictionary def. This guy is evil personified!
Arkansas Granny
(31,525 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Norbert
(6,040 posts)But I guess that only applies to the very real tRump crime spree and not made-up Dem crimes.
The Genealogist
(4,723 posts)Guessing e-mails and Benghazi, because whenever the deplorables hear one of these words, Rush and the gang has taught them to salivate on cue.
Midnight Writer
(21,788 posts)The right wing alternative story that is being trumpeted all day, every day on hate radio and right wing media is that the investigation into Trump campaign Russian collusion was ginned up by Hillary. She cleverly used the Steele dossier (which is based largely on Russian sources) by arranging it to fall into the hands of John McCain. McCain, shocked at what he saw, turned the dossier over to his FBI contacts, who used the phony info within to get a warrant to surveil a member of the Trump campaign. This kicked off the whole Trump/Russia collusion investigation. Oh, yeah, I think Obama was supposed to be involved as well.
Therefore, as anyone can plainly see, it was Hillary who was working with the Russians and treasonous Deep State actors, not Trump.
Barr is tasked with finding classified documents to support this claim and releasing them to the public.
Volaris
(10,274 posts)He's bullshit .
He's telling the press what he thinks Trump wants to hear.
Before she was a politician, Hillary was a lawyer, and pretty damned good at her job from what I've heard.
Hung over on a Thursday at 8am in her jammies shell send Barr to prison if hes dumb enough to fuck with her lol!
Bring it.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Just FUCK HIM!
Get that fat little fuck out of there now!
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I dont ever get offended when people call him a fat fuck. If he were a decent man no one would fat shame him.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 1, 2019, 10:15 PM - Edit history (1)
without calling him a "FAT fuck," so as not to offend OTHER people who may be struggling with their weight. THAT'S whom I'm defending!!
It's called "common decency"...doesn't have anything to do with defending that prick... isnt it sufficient to call that prick a prick without referring to him as a "FAT prick"?
Do whatever you want, but, I am the LAST person you should accuse of defending that scumbag (not FAT scumbag) just for requesting that you refrain from fat shaming, so as to be considerate of those who may have weight issues. I can't think of ONE kind word to say about that piece of shit!! (Not FAT piece of shit)
Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Do you think no fat person can understand the sentiment? Or that all us fat people will burst into tears because our feelings have been hurt? What youre doing is implying that one person being called a fat fuck will make all fat people crumble, or that being fat is so shameful that all fat people must therefore be defective. You are totally wrong in your suppositions. Fat people dont need to be treated with kid gloves.
And quite frankly if someone chooses to insult me about being fat I am more than capable of putting them in their place and defending myself. Theres nothing wrong with fat people just because were fat. If you think its disrespectful to say the word fat about someone then by all means dont use the word.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)that dipshit, asshole prick tRump as fat, cocksucker, and other descriptors that OTHER people have said offends them. If it doesn't offend you, that's great... that doesn't mean others don't deserve our consideration and respect.
But, besides that, just don't accuse me of DEFENDING that dipshit, asshole, prick just because I suggest not adding FAT as a further insult. I think ANYONE can see my legitimate point, even if you disagree... it should be so obvious to any fair-minded person that it shouldn't even require any further explanation.
But, carry on... make fun of other fat people if that makes you feel better.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I do not shame fat people because they are fat. I shame evil republican fat people because they are evil republican fat people. I do not hold others who are overweight in the same contempt.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I did not mean to be insensitive to all overweight people. See my posts below. I barely notice the weight of decent people. For instance, Jerry Nadler. I would never remark about his weight. He is a kind, decent person. And so are many other people who are overweight.
But for some reason, when it comes to piggish, evil, republicans, their weight seems to repulse me for some unknown reason. It doesn't make any sense logically, but there is something about the fat, rich, white, hateful republican that really makes me want to go on the attack.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)which is OKAY. What is NOT okay is țo suggest that, by expressing my objection to fat-shaming, that should somehow be construed as DEFENDING President Pig Vomit, like that other poster accused me of doing and who refuses to retract that accusation. THAT is absurd in the extreme and inexcusably goes beyond any honest disagreement we may have about insulting people for being fat.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)If he were a decent man, I would never have said a word about his weight. And I never would about a decent person. But there is something particularly loathsome to me about evil, FAT, rich, white, republican men. I don't know why they repulse me so much, but they do.
still_one
(92,372 posts)behavior
Butterflylady
(3,547 posts)He deserves it.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 1, 2019, 11:50 PM - Edit history (1)
to the other poster, in the string directly above your response, I simply suggested foregoing fat shaming insults about that prick out of respect and in consideration of those who struggle with their weight.
You can disagree if you like, that's fine... just don't accuse me of DEFENDING that asshole simply for making that suggestion, like that other poster accused me of doing. I take strong exception to that... certainly, you can see we why.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2020!!!
Welcome to the revolution!!!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)However, when it comes to ugly, rich, white, fat, republican men, I can't seem to help myself. There is something about the fat republican man that just repulses me, whereas I don't find others who are overweight to be worthy of ridicule.
There is something particularly loathsome to me about the fat, rich, republican man. I can't explain it. Obesity does not stir the same disgust in me when I see it in others. I'm not sure why. It just doesn't.
Turin_C3PO
(14,033 posts)For instance Jerrold Nadler is obese but hes not repulsive because he is not a bigoted, loathsome person like Barr is.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I barely notice his physicality because he is a decent person. I know my thinking is not rational, but there you have it.
trueblue2007
(17,237 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)Ditto
liberal N proud
(60,340 posts)delisen
(6,044 posts)Volaris
(10,274 posts)And that scares the ever loving shit out of them .
So do Warren and Cortez. Wait for it , it's coming.
Turin_C3PO
(14,033 posts)Weve seen this movie before, in foreign countries, and we know what comes next.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)Buckeyeblue
(5,500 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,086 posts)Either that, or he's beyond deluded in thinking that after the previous EIGHT investigations against her that they are going to find something this time.
czarjak
(11,287 posts)"We're getting there"
scarytomcat
(1,706 posts)isn't that the new rule
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)He gets what he wants out of it - a nation with permanent Republican theocratic rule.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Jeesh! Weve seen this behavior dozens of times. Trump watches them so they have to please Dear Leader.
toddwv
(2,830 posts)
WILLIAM BARR: Right, so Huber had originally been asked to take a look at the FISA applications and the electronic surveillance but then he stood back and put that on hold while the Office of Inspector General was conducting its review, which would've been normal for the department. And he was essentially on standby in case Mr. Horowitz referred a matter to him to be handled criminally. So he has not been active on this front in recent months and so Durham is taking over that role. The other issues he's been working on relate to Hillary Clinton. Those are winding down and hopefully we'll be in a position to bring those to fruition.
creeksneakers2
(7,476 posts)doesn't sound like its going anywhere.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,170 posts)madaboutharry
(40,219 posts)Fuck Off
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,749 posts)lunasun
(21,646 posts)struggle4progress
(118,331 posts)Hillary's role in the Vince Foster murder! time to find out why she aborted The Alien's baby!"
Captain Zero
(6,823 posts)Wouldn't there be "discovery" by the defense whereby those charged could open up more avenues into Trump's Russian connections. Does Barr really want to go there?
Mc Mike
(9,115 posts)Politicizing the justice dept. Using the powers of the Executive Branch to go after the repug prez's 'enemies'.
Vinca
(50,302 posts)They won't amount to shit, but the King will have his election talking point.