Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

triron

(22,009 posts)
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 06:00 PM Apr 2019

Shugerman (law professor at Fordham) says Mueller proved Trump conspired with Russia!

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/25/opinion/mueller-trump-campaign-russia-conpiracy-.html

William Barr accurately quoted it as saying that “the investigation did not establish” that the Trump campaign “conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

But the opposite is also true: The Mueller report does establish that, in fact, members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.

How is this possible? It’s the difference between the report’s criminal prosecution standard of proof “beyond a reasonable doubt” and a lower standard — the preponderance standard of “more likely than not” — relevant for counterintelligence and general parlance about facts, and closer to the proper standard for impeachment.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shugerman (law professor at Fordham) says Mueller proved Trump conspired with Russia! (Original Post) triron Apr 2019 OP
One example: Pachamama Apr 2019 #1
Here's the Exhibit Ponietz Apr 2019 #3
Thanks for providing the exact exhibit from Mueller Report Pachamama Apr 2019 #4
Amongst many smoking guns. triron Apr 2019 #6
👋 Ponietz Apr 2019 #8
Was Mueller charged with using the standard of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" Poiuyt Apr 2019 #2
What do you think? Anyway I'll take Shugerman's legal opinion here. triron Apr 2019 #5
No wonder Barr has fought to keep an unredacted version from Congress. Karadeniz Apr 2019 #7
knr triron Apr 2019 #9
K&R, .. and who narrowed Mueller's scope to Russian "government" ?!!? Knowing Putin uses cutouts uponit7771 Apr 2019 #10
1:15 am? Anyway I woould sure like to know the answer to your question. triron Apr 2019 #11
Probably Rosenstein NewJeffCT Apr 2019 #12
Not McCabe I'm betting, based on what he has come out and said recently. triron Apr 2019 #13

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
1. One example:
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 06:15 PM
Apr 2019

In the Mueller Report:

On election night - At 2:40AM Trump spoke to Hillary Clinton. At "████" (redacted time) after Trump called Dmitriev and said “Putin has won”



This....

Pachamama

(16,887 posts)
4. Thanks for providing the exact exhibit from Mueller Report
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 06:43 PM
Apr 2019

It still has me stunned

Has there ever been a Presidential Elect that made a call (at any time - but especially as his next call) to tell ANYONE that the winner of the election wasn’t themselves but rather the Leader of a Foreign Adversary???? Especially one who meddled and interfered in the election with attempts to alter the election?



This to me is a smoking gun of collusion and that Trump was working with Putin and the Russians and is compromised and owned by them

Ponietz

(2,996 posts)
8. 👋
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 07:51 PM
Apr 2019

Definitely a smoking gun.
Someone in the incoming administration sent that text and it may have been Addleall Taint himself.

Poiuyt

(18,129 posts)
2. Was Mueller charged with using the standard of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt"
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 06:26 PM
Apr 2019

Anybody who looks can see that Trump and his campaign colluded with the Russians, but Barr was able to take control of the narrative and say just the opposite.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Shugerman (law professor ...