Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 02:32 PM Apr 2019

Low Oil Pressure Caused Viking Sky's Engine Blackout

https://gcaptain.com/norway-low-oil-pressure-caused-viking-sky-engine-blackout/

“Our conclusion is that the engine failure was directly caused by low oil pressure,” the Norwegian Maritime Authority said in a statement.

“The level of lubricating oil in the tanks was within set limits, however relatively low, when the vessel started to cross Hustadvika,” it added, referring to the stretch of water where the incident happened.

The heavy seas probably caused movements in the tanks so large that the supply to the lubricating oil pumps stopped, the regulator said.

This triggered an alarm indicating a low level of lubricating oil, which in turn caused an automatic shutdown of the engines.

The engine lube oil level (while within limits) was also a major factor in the sinking of the SS El Faro with loss of all on board in October 2015.

The rules are that the oil system has to be able to maintain pressure at a 15 degree permanent list and 5 degree permanent trim (46 CFR 58.50-80)

Quite often main propulsion engines use dry sumps, where oil drains from the engine into a separate tank below the engine. This tank would have baffles to control oil movement during ship's motion. It is also common to have electrically driven oil pumps instead of engine driven pumps.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Low Oil Pressure Caused Viking Sky's Engine Blackout (Original Post) Turbineguy Apr 2019 OP
Amazing how Wellstone ruled Apr 2019 #1
MV Bright Field Turbineguy Apr 2019 #3
My guess was right, Wellstone ruled Apr 2019 #5
"also a major factor in the sinking of the SS El Faro" mitch96 Apr 2019 #2
In the investigation it came out Turbineguy Apr 2019 #4
Penny wise and pound foolish, perhaps. hunter Apr 2019 #6
The last ship I was Chief on... Turbineguy Apr 2019 #7

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
3. MV Bright Field
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:41 PM
Apr 2019

in New Orleans. Company did not want to buy lube oil until the price was right. They moved the ship and all went well until the ship leaned over a little in a turn. Hit the dock at the Riverwalk area. It could have been a lot worse.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
5. My guess was right,
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 05:56 PM
Apr 2019

crew was expendable at the cost of a few Barrels of Diesel Oil. Great Management Liability Control,hope someone gets promoted right to the Jail House.

mitch96

(13,904 posts)
2. "also a major factor in the sinking of the SS El Faro"
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:16 PM
Apr 2019

I did not know it lost it's engines while in a hurricane. All I read was that it was lost in the storm.. sucks. My father was US Navy, merchant mariner for 50+ years and never had a problem from what he told me...
m

Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
4. In the investigation it came out
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 04:45 PM
Apr 2019

that a previous Chief Engineer would always run the oil level high while in bad weather. This information never reached everybody.

The oil level was within the engine builder's specs.

hunter

(38,313 posts)
6. Penny wise and pound foolish, perhaps.
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 07:30 PM
Apr 2019

Is there any good reason not to keep the lubricating oil tanks topped up?

What percentage of the overall operating cost is lubricating oil, even with moderately jacked up prices in some ports?


Turbineguy

(37,331 posts)
7. The last ship I was Chief on...
Sun Apr 14, 2019, 11:25 PM
Apr 2019

You rarely changed the oil in the main engine. Over time the oil would become contaminated and you would discard and replace 250 gallons a few times per year. Changing the oil would only happen as a result of a major casualty like an internal engine fire and crankcase explosion. These are extremely rare. The full engine oil change was 10,000 gallons. That's $200,000 sitting in a tank until you need it. Some companies know that's a cost of business. In others, somebody in an office sees that as $200,000 that could be saved.

There are rules about sailing a ship in an "unseaworthy" condition. But there's always room for nuance. Let's say the minimum oil level in the engine is 9000 gallons. That would mean you would be seaworthy and could sail if your storage tank was 1000 gallons short of being full. And it works until your luck runs out.

Shipping companies always look at what they can cut. Cutting here and there relatively small amounts adds up because everything is expensive. There's nothing inherently wrong with being economical. But the ships' senior officers have to stand up to those who may not fully understand the effect of their decision beyond saving some money.

And there are companies that are not sufficiently well-capitalized enough. Large container ships burn over $100,000 per day in fuel. To managers, pretty much the only way to make up for that is to dis-allow crew members to have a second pork chop for dinner. Even though you don't get anywhere near that. But it's how organizations work.

I found the key to long term success is to keep up on the maintenance, focusing on safety, reliability and zero pollution.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Low Oil Pressure Caused V...