General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump DoJ abandons defense of laws banning female genital mutilation
WTF? Neal Katyal was acting solicitor general under Obama and drafted the Special Counsel statute.
Link to tweet
Just learned Trump DOJ has now abandoned its defense of the statute criminalizing, of all things, female genital mutilation. This is what happens when you torch your institutional responsibilities to defend statutes, and gut the traditional standard DOJ has applied in past admin
Response to Katyal:
Link to tweet
What do you mean by DOJ abandoning its defense of the FGM statute? Do you mean theyre not appealing this decision, or something else?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/judge-rules-that-federal-law-banning-female-genital-mutilation-is-unconstitutional/2018/11/21/a9455728-edd2-11e8-96d4-0d23f2aaad09_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b3e811fb57e0
response:
Link to tweet
That is correct. The solicitor general has informed Rep. Nadler in a letter today that it will not appeal and will not defend the statute banning female genital mutilation. My god. What statute is next?
Mister Ed
(5,940 posts)I wonder if the Trump administration is going to turn a blind eye to this sick and evil exercise of "religious freedom" in order to create a precedent for allowing similarly vicious exercises of "religious freedom" by conservative "Christians".
real Cannabis calm
(1,124 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)Would they cut off the tip of boys penises?
The anger I feel about this makes me feel like gagging.
Including me.
That circumcision is a form of male genital mutilation.
If it isn't your body then it's not your choice, leave it alone.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Ive also read of puberty rituals among primitive people in the Amazon and the African bush.
It all seems really perverse.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)That circumcision, (which OBTW removes more skin surface area than what's left on the entire penis), would be treated with a similar outrage as female genital mutilation or at least nearly as much.
But alas, that isn't the case.
katmondoo
(6,457 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)How many times has he recounted, with sick, depraved glee his fantasies about women being tied up and beaten as they were smuggled across the border?
Second: Giving the green light to FGM allows him to point at Muslims and say "look at these very sick people!" and further vilify, ostracize, dehumanize and "other" Muslims in his unending quest to advance white supremacy.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)is spot on - they're going to use it to scare the Trump Base into thinking Sharia Law is coming to America
spanone
(135,846 posts)niyad
(113,370 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 12, 2019, 12:20 PM - Edit history (1)
but, I think upthread somebody had it right - they're going to use it to bash Muslims. I added in - and scare the base into thinking Sharia Law is coming
IronLionZion
(45,462 posts)Is there some voting bloc the Trump administration thinks they can win over? Because I immediately expect they might make a bold play against abortion rights after this precedent. Or they'll screw over transgender people.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)to say that since the law was overturned, it means that Sharia Law is coming unless you vote to re-elect Trump - even though the judge was appointed by Reagan
Bob Loblaw
(1,900 posts)there's footage of Trump committing the offense in the pee tape.
Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)this would keep plastic surgery legal.
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)Jared assuring that sweet sweet oil money keeps coming his way?
sinkingfeeling
(51,461 posts)is to enforce the law.
https://www.justice.gov/about