General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSimple question - at what point will Mueller expose this
Con goon of an AG?
A House hearing???
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)RKP5637
(67,111 posts)Collusion results. Every bit of this crooked administration is amazing. And IMO Obstruction is a definite yes, they just don't know how to frame it yet other than hiding it. "Con goon of an AG," good name!
mercuryblues
(14,532 posts)If called to testify, he will. He won't try this case in the media and give interviews.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)He has been publicly silent so far. No reason to think that will change.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Barr is doing.
It may not be all about what Mueller may do, however . . .
Rachel tonight, after doing a somewhat elaborate illustration of 'I'm just a country lawyer' by Watergate Ervin, followed by Nadler, and Senator Blumenthal cameos did their own, sly 'I'm not a lawyer' thing . . . and then Rachel casually evoked from Watergate prosecutor Lacavora, that - the Grand Jury in Watergate issued it's own findings and statement, with the Lacavora statement that, he 'saw no reason why the [Mueller] Grand Jury couldn't do the same.'
Another power player in the game? Why Not?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)for major News Dumps. Maybe a thumb drive in the mail box? Hmmmm.
Takket
(21,577 posts)Has already skipped ahead and read the ending of the book, as is satisfied to take his time reading the rest of it now.
Vinca
(50,278 posts)It wouldn't surprise me. Watch the Washington Post and the New York Times and Rachel Maddow.