General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSharice Davids doesn't commit to 'Medicare for all' or 'Green New Deal' at town hall
U.S. Rep. Sharice Davids said Sunday she cant commit to supporting two policy proposals dominating debate within her party heading into the 2020 presidential election: a Green New Deal to combat climate change and Medicare for all to reform the nations healthcare system.
During her first town hall since taking office in January, Davids told a crowd gathered at Saint Andrew Christian Church in Olathe that she is committed to expanding access to health care and addressing climate change.
But she said her focus, especially on healthcare, is to work on legislation that we can get bipartisan support on and move forward with right now.
I cant say what the next step looks like on health care, she said, but the things I can actually put energy into, I want them to be things that can get bipartisan support.
https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article228281724.html
Here are some excerpts of her town hall taken from the Shawnee Mission Post Facebook page:
*HEALTHCARE
Healthcare dominated the discussion at the event, making up the majority of questions submitted prior to the town hall as well as a good portion of the questions submitted by members of the audience. Davids indicated that her guiding principle in reviewing healthcare policy was finding ways to expand access to coverage.
Hundreds of constituents came out for the town hall event in Olathe on Sunday.
Universal access to affordable, quality health care is a right in this country, she said. It has to be the thing that were really pushing forward on. It has to be that no one in this country goes bankrupt because they got cancer, or because one of their family members got cancer. I cannot believe that is part of the status quo.
Asked about the Medicare for All bill introduced by Rep. Pramila Jayapal, Davids said she was not prepared to sign on at this point, indicating that she would have to thoroughly vet any piece of legislation she would lend her name to and that she was most interested in finding approaches that could get bi-partisan support.
I am really focused on making sure that Im working on
pieces of legislation that we can get bipartisan support on, that we can move forward on right now, Davids said. I cant say what the next step looks like. But the things that I can actually put effort and energy toward, I want them to be things that can get bipartisan support.
*BORDER SECURITY AND IMMIGRATION
Davids said she opposed the border wall being championed by President Donald Trump in part because she believed there were more effective ways to address issues with border security.
We have to do things that are actually going to be effective when were talking about border security, she said. And I dont think the wall is
effective.
She suggested the wider implementation of technological solutions, like scanning vehicles coming across the border and into ports of entry, would be a better approach to address issues like drug and human trafficking.
Davids told the audience she believed the immigration system was broken, and that it had been a failure of Congress not to have addressed the issue sooner. She said protecting the Dreamers would be among her priorities for immigration reform, as well as reducing the amount of time people wait to get through the immigration process.
*GUN CONTROL
Davids who noted that she had grown up in a military family and was familiar with firearms (Ive shot plenty of guns. I know what kickback feels like) noted that the right to bear arms is enshrined in the Constitution.
But every single one of our rights in the Constitution also has, somewhere, some kind of limit, she said. There are boundaries that we have to acknowledge. And we do that when issues of safety come up.
She pointed to a background check bill recently passed through the House.
If youre a law abiding citizen and you can pass a background check, you can still go buy a firearm. This doesnt interfere with that, she said. But we have to make sure that were thinking about issues of domestic violence. If someone has a history of domestic violence, I think they should not be able to get their hands on a firearm.
*TAX POLICY
Davids said she wouldnt be supportive of fully reversing the 2017 tax bill signed by President Trump because, given its sweeping nature, there were some provisions in it that she believed were beneficial to the middle class. However, she said, the bill also had provisions that were setbacks for the middle class. She said the country needs to move toward a tax policy that allows it to invest in the future.
Here in Kansas having to still deal with the effects of the Brownback tax experiment has made it very clear that you cannot avoid investing in our public education system, she said. And if you continue to give the wealthiest corporations, the wealthiest people a bunch of tax breaks, were going to continue to see a big deficit.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A sensible, not sensational, approach to many of the issues facing Americans these days. I love her methodical approach to issues, probably because of her professional, legal background advocating for people. She really has a deep concern for her constituents. She's not looking for headlines, just accomplishments.
murielm99
(30,775 posts)I agree with her approach. "Tear it all down" is not the way to go, especially with the orange thing in office.
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)Now, if the govt regulated health insurers like a power utility, then maybe. But, under the current system, there's no such thing as affordable heath insurance.
George II
(67,782 posts)...not trash it and try to establish a completely new system.
BTW, insurance companies ARE regulated, similar to power utilities.
Yavin4
(35,446 posts)We just don't have enough democracy in order to do it.
IOW, the true will of the people hardly ever makes it into policy in our current system.
George II
(67,782 posts)And we'll never have any system without private insurance companies.
Do you realize that private insurance companies play a HUGE part in the success of the current Medicare system that covers those 65+ and keeps the overall cost reasonable? Without private insurance companies Medicare would cost those covered much more than it does now, if it didn't collapse altogether.
Gothmog
(145,635 posts)I saw that Lizzie Fletcher took similar positions. They are both in swing districts that they flipped
rogue emissary
(3,148 posts)Gothmog
(145,635 posts)One cannot run as a socialist or out of the mainstream proposals in a swing district. Lizzie like Sharice flipped her district in 2018
Link to tweet
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)"A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step."
I think it's great that there are people talking about 'Medicare for all' and 'The Green New Deal'. They're talking about where the journey will hopefully end up. It's important to have a destination in mind.
However, it's equally important that we have people that have a realistic idea about what the first step on that journey should be.
Docreed2003
(16,879 posts)I appreciate the fact that she's recognizing the problem and choosing to address the problems in a reasonable, realistic way.
sheshe2
(83,942 posts)sheshe2
(83,942 posts)Other than mom care, I am okay. Hope all is well with you!
brer cat
(24,621 posts)Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)sheshe2
(83,942 posts)No pie in the sky but sound ideas to get it done.
Brava. I am very impressed by Sharice.
Cha
(297,774 posts)Pragmatic! She actually wants to get important issues accomplished by focusing and working on them incrementally.
Mahalo for this Town Hall from Sharice, George